| Autor: |
Elisa Gomes de Albuquerque, Flavio Warol, Chane Tardem, Fernanda Signorelli Calazans, Luiz Augusto Poubel, Thalita P. Matos, Jullian J. Souza, Alessandra Reis, Marcos O. Barceleiro, Alessandro D. Loguercio |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Dentistry. 122:104120 |
| ISSN: |
0300-5712 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104120 |
| Popis: |
To evaluate the clinical performance of a new dual-cure universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied using different application strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 36 months.Futurabond U was applied in NCCLs of 50 subjects using four adhesion strategies (n = 50 restorations per group): only self-etch (SEE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). All cavities were restored using Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 36 months using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.The after 36-month retention rates were 87% (75-92%) for SEE, 94% (83-98%) for SET, 91% (80-97%) for ERDry, and 94% (83-98%) for ERWet. Forty-three restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 36-month recall (18 for SEE, 12 for SET, 7 for ERDry, and 6 for ERWet; p0.05). One restoration was detected as a minor marginal discoloration at the 36-month recall (1 for SET; p0.05). No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence at 36 months.The clinical performance of the Futurabond U did not depend on the employed bonding strategy, and it was considered reliable after 36 months of clinical evaluation. However, greater marginal discrepancy was observed in the self-etch groups.NCCLs restorations using a dual-cure universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes showed satisfactory clinical performance after 36 months. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect