Archaeological knowledge production and global communities: boundaries and structure of the field
| Autor: | Marina Toumpouri, Ingrida Kelpšienė, Rimvydas Laužikas, Suzie Thomas, Isto Huvila, Vykintas Vaitkevičius, Pedro Luengo, Costis Dallas, Helena Nobre |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Historia del Arte, Archaeology, Centre of Excellence in Ancient Near Eastern Empires (ANEE), Museology, Department of Cultures |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Archeology
media_common.quotation_subject Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap Yuri Lotman MUSEUMS Conservation 050601 international relations Information Studies 615 History and Archaeology Education CULTURAL PROPERTY Cultural property Classical archaeology DESTINATION 0601 history and archaeology archaeology-related communities Arkeologi media_common digital heritage Structure (mathematical logic) WORK TOURISM 060102 archaeology HERITAGE Field (Bourdieu) 05 social sciences 06 humanities and the arts semiosphere theory nonprofessional archaeology Archaeology ALTERNATIVE ARCHAEOLOGIES 0506 political science Cultural heritage Negotiation Geography Expression (architecture) non-professional archaeology COLLEGE Tourism CC1-960 |
| Zdroj: | Open Archaeology, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 350-364 (2018) BASE-Bielefeld Academic Search Engine idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla instname idUS: Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Popis: | Archaeology and material cultural heritage enjoys a particular status as a form of heritage that, capturing the public imagination, has become the locus for the expression and negotiation of regional, national, and intra-national cultural identities. One important question is: why and how do contemporary people engage with archaeological heritage objects, artefacts, information or knowledge outside the realm of an professional, academically-based archaeology? This question is investigated here from the perspective of theoretical considerations based on Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere theory, which helps to describe the connections between the centre and peripheries of professional archaeology as sign structures. The centre may be defined according to prevalent scientific paradigms, while periphery in the space of creolisation in which, through interactions with other culturally more distant sign structures, archaeology-related nonprofessional communities emerge. On the basis of these considerations, we use collocation analysis on representative English language corpora to outline the structure of the field of archaeology-related nonprofessional communities, identify salient creolised peripheral spaces and archaeology-related practices, and develop a framework for further investigation of archaeological knowledge production and reuse in the context of global archaeology. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|