Validity of an Automated Balance Error Scoring System
| Autor: | Alessandro Napoli, Carole A. Tucker, Stephen M Glass, Elizabeth Thompson, Iyad Obeid |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Scoring system business.industry Interclass correlation Rehabilitation Limits of agreement Biophysics Balance test 030229 sport sciences Motor behavior 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Postural stability Physical therapy Computerized system Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Balance (ability) |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 35:32-36 |
| ISSN: | 1543-2688 1065-8483 |
| DOI: | 10.1123/jab.2018-0056 |
| Popis: | The balance error scoring system (BESS) is a human-scored, field-based balance test used in cases of suspected concussion. Recently developed instrumented alternatives to human scoring carry substantial advantages over traditional testing, but thus far report relatively abstract outcomes that may not be useful to clinicians or coaches. In contrast, the automated assessment of postural stability (AAPS) is a computerized system that tabulates error events in accordance with the original description of the BESS. This study compared AAPS and human-based BESS scores. A total of 25 healthy adults performed the modified BESS. Tests were scored twice each by 3 human raters and the computerized system. Interrater (between human) and intermethod (AAPS vs human) agreement (interclass correlation coefficient2,1) were calculated alongside Bland–Altman limits of agreement. Interrater analyses were significant (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|