Analogy, Similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments
| Autor: | Jean H. M. Wagemans |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | ACLC (FGw) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Persuasion
periodic table of arguments Computer science argument from analogy media_common.quotation_subject Analogy 02 engineering and technology 0603 philosophy ethics and religion argument scheme Ethos Similarity (psychology) AZ20-999 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Rhetorical question similarity media_common Dialectic argument classification 06 humanities and the arts analogy Epistemology Philosophy Pathos comparison 060302 philosophy Table (database) 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing History of scholarship and learning. The humanities |
| Zdroj: | Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Vol 55, Iss 1, Pp 63-75 (2018) Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55(1), 63-75. University of Bialystok |
| ISSN: | 2199-6059 0860-150X |
| Popis: | The aim of this paper is to indicate the systematic place of arguments based on the concept of analogy within the theoretical framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments, a new method for describing and classifying arguments that integrates traditional dialectical accounts of arguments and fallacies and rhetorical accounts of the means of persuasion (logos, ethos, pathos) into a comprehensive framework. The paper begins with an inventory of existing approaches to arguments based on analogy, similarity and adjacent concepts. Then, the theoretical framework of the table will be expounded and several concrete examples of arguments based on these concepts will be analyzed in terms of the framework. Finally, the results of these analyses will be summarized and it will be indicated how they can be refined in further research related to the Periodic Table of Arguments. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|