Y-Type Urethral Duplication: A True Variant of the Anomaly or a Misnomer?
| Autor: | Osama El-Naggar, Hesham Soliman Safoury, Amr Abdelhamid AbouZeid, Nehal A. Radwan, Shaimaa Abdelsattar Mohammad, Sameh A. Hay |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Fistula Urinary system Anal Canal Sex Factors Urethra medicine Humans Pelvis medicine.diagnostic_test Genitourinary system business.industry Urethral sphincter Rectum Infant Magnetic resonance imaging Anatomy medicine.disease Hypoplasia Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Urogenital Abnormalities Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Vagina Female business |
| Zdroj: | European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. 26(3) |
| ISSN: | 1439-359X |
| Popis: | Objectives The objective of this study was to define anatomical and radiological features of the so-called Y-type urethral duplication. Methods The study included four male patients and one female patient with congenital connection between the urogenital tract and the external anal orifice. Investigations included renal sonography, urethrograms, and magnetic resonance imaging pelvis in the last patient. The urethrograms of male patients were carefully reviewed, in addition to available urethrograms of similar cases that could be obtained through searching the literature. Results Unlike cases of urethral duplication, the male patients had always a complete prepuce and a functioning anterior urethra in 25%. The accessory uroanal channel had almost always a constant origin from the posterior urethra. Some tension seems to be exerted by the urethroanal tract pulling on and causing a kink in the posterior urethra. Management was simple in patients without anterior urethral hypoplasia (one male and the female patient). Both were treated by simple excision of the communicating ano-urogenital tract through a perineal approach with an excellent outcome. Histopathological examination of excised tracts revealed stratified squamous cell in the former and transitional cell lining in the latter. In patients with hypoplastic anterior urethra, staged urethral reconstruction was performed in two, and progressive dilatation of hypoplastic anterior urethra was tried in the last patient. Conclusion Several observations would support diagnosing the congenital connection between the urinary tract and the external anal orifice in the male as a congenital fistula rather than an accessory urethra. Confirming and accepting this information may have its impact on changing the current surgical approach. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|