Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus and in-stent restenosis: Insights from the randomized DARE trial
Autor: | José P.S. Henriques, Martijn Meuwissen, Bimmer E. Claessen, Jan J. Piek, Jan Baan, Marleen H. van Wely, Kirsten Boerlage-van Dijk, René J. van der Schaaf, A T Marcel Gosselink, Atilla Dirkali, Jeroen Vendrik, E. Karin Arkenbout, Niels van Royen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Cardiology, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, ACS - Pulmonary hypertension & thrombosis, Graduate School, ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias, ACS - Microcirculation, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, AGEM - Endocrinology, metabolism and nutrition, APH - Aging & Later Life |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Paclitaxel medicine.medical_treatment Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16] Urology Coronary Artery Disease 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Prosthesis Design Balloon Cardiac Catheters Coronary Restenosis 03 medical and health sciences All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 0302 clinical medicine Coated Materials Biocompatible Restenosis Risk Factors Diabetes mellitus Diabetes Mellitus medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging In patient Everolimus Prospective Studies 030212 general & internal medicine Angioplasty Balloon Coronary Adverse effect Aged Netherlands business.industry Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 16] Stent Percutaneous coronary intervention Cardiovascular Agents Drug-Eluting Stents General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease Treatment Outcome Drug-eluting stent Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
Zdroj: | Claessen, B E, Henriques, J P S, Vendrik, J, Boerlage-van Dijk, K, van der Schaaf, R J, Meuwissen, M, van Royen, N, Gosselink, A T M, van Wely, M H, Dirkali, A, Arkenbout, E K, Piek, J J & Baan, J 2019, ' Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus and in-stent restenosis: Insights from the randomized DARE trial ', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 216-221 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27814 Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 93, 216-221 Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 93(2), 216-221. Wiley-Liss Inc. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 93(2), 216-221. Wiley-Liss Inc. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 93, 2, pp. 216-221 |
ISSN: | 1522-1946 |
Popis: | Objectives: To investigate the relative performance of treatment with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) compared with an everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Background: ISR remains a challenge in contemporary clinical practice, particularly in patients with DM. Methods: In the multicenter randomized DARE trial, patients with BMS or DES ISR were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to treatment with a PEB or an EES. Patients underwent angiographic follow-up after 6 months. For the purpose of this analysis, the relative performance of PEB versus EES in diabetic patients was investigated. Results: Of 278 patients enrolled in DARE, 88 (32%) had DM, of whom 46 were randomized to EES and 42 to PEB treatment. Of patients with DM, 48 (55%) had DES-ISR. Angiographic follow-up was available in 30 patients (72%) in the PEB group and 36 patients (78%) in the DES group. There were no differences in terms of 6-months minimal lumen diameter in diabetic patients treated with EES (1.46 ± 0.66 mm) versus PEB (1.78 ± 0.58 mm, P = 0.15). Adverse events at one year follow-up were similar in both groups, with Major Adverse Events (MAE, death, target vessel MI, or TVR) occurring in 17.4% in the EES group versus 11.9% in the PEB group, P = 0.44. Conclusions: In patients with ISR and DM, use of a PEB resulted in similar 6-months in-segment minimal lumen diameter and comparable rates of MAE. In-segment late loss at 6 months was significantly lower in the PEB arm. Although larger trials in DM patients with ISR are necessary, PEB is a promising treatment option obviating the need for additional stent implantation. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |