Multiple drawing multi-colour urns by stochastic approximation
Autor: | Olfa Selmi, Cécile Mailler, Nabil Lasmar |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Statistics and Probability
Mathematics(all) General Mathematics Markov process Stochastic approximation 01 natural sciences Multiple drawing Pólya urn 010104 statistics & probability symbols.namesake Polya urn stochastic approximation FOS: Mathematics 0101 mathematics Mathematics Discrete mathematics discrete-time martingale Probability (math.PR) 010102 general mathematics Ball (bearing) symbols limit theorem Statistics Probability and Uncertainty reinforced process Mathematics - Probability |
Zdroj: | Lasmar, N, Mailler, C & Selmi, O 2018, ' Multiple drawing multi-colour urns by stochastic approximation ', Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 254-281 . https://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2018.16 |
ISSN: | 1475-6072 0021-9002 |
Popis: | A classical P��lya urn scheme is a Markov process whose evolution is encoded by a replacement matrix $(R_{i,j})_{1\leq i,j\leq d}$. At every discrete time-step, we draw a ball uniformly at random, denote its colour $c$, and replace it in the urn together with $R_{c,j}$ balls of colour $j$ (for all $1\leq j\leq d$). We are interested in multi-drawing P��lya urns, where the replacement rule depends on the random drawing of a set of $m$ balls from the urn (with or without replacement). This generalisation has already been studied in the literature, in particular by Kuba & Mahmoud (ArXiv:1503.09069 and 1509.09053), where second order asymptotic results are proved for $2$-colour urns under the balanced and the affinity assumptions. The main idea of this work is to apply stochastic approximation methods to this problem, which enables us to remove the affinity hypothesis of Kuba & Mahmoud and generalise the result to more-than-two-colour urns. We also give some partial results in the two-colour non-balanced case. This new arxiv version (v6) corrects a mistake that we discovered in the previous versions of this paper (v1-5). The mistake was in Theorem 1$(a)$ and in the last sentence of Theorem 4. In this new version, Theorem 1$(a)$ has been corrected, and Theorem 4 has been deleted |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |