Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy 'mini-residency' experience on postgraduate urologists' practice patterns
Autor: | Louis Eichel, Ralph V. Clayman, David S. Chou, John R. Boker, Carlos Uribe, Thomas E. Ahlering, Elspeth M. McDougall, Corollos S. Abdelshehid, Gabriela Stoliar, Federico A. Corica, Sepi S. Khonsari, Leandro G. Sala |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2007 |
Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Urology education Biophysics MEDLINE medicine Humans Robotic surgery Practice Patterns Physicians' Laparoscopy Response rate (survey) Prostatectomy medicine.diagnostic_test Practice patterns business.industry Questionnaire Internship and Residency Preceptor Robotics Middle Aged Computer Science Applications Surgery Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Physical therapy Education Medical Continuing business |
Zdroj: | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS. 2(1) |
ISSN: | 1478-596X |
Popis: | Introduction To assist practising urologists acquire and incorporate robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) into their practice, a 5 day mini-residency (M-R) programme with a mentor, preceptor and potential proctor experience was established at the University of California, Irvine, Yamanouchi Center for Urological Education. The follow-up results from the initial 21 RALP M-R participants are presented. Methods Between September 2003 and September 2004, 21 urologists from six states and four countries underwent a RALP M-R. Each participant underwent 1:2 teacher:attendee instruction over a 5 day period, which included inanimate model skills training, animal/cadaver laboratory skills training and operating room observation experience. Participants were also offered a proctoring experience at their hospital if they so desired. A questionnaire survey was mailed 1-14 months (mean 7.2 months) following completion of the mini-residency and these results were tabulated and reviewed. Results A 100% response rate was achieved from the mailed questionnaires. The mean M-R participant age was 43 years (range 33-55 years). One-third of the M-R participants were practising in an academic environment. Most of the participants (55%) had no fellowship training. Of those with fellowship training (45%), three (15%) were in laparoscopy and three (15%) were in oncology; 25% of the participants were in large (>6 physicians), 25% in small (2-6 physicians) and 15% in solo practices; 70% of the participants were located in an urban setting. The majority of the participants (80%) had laparoscopic experience during residency training and had performed 20-60 laparoscopic cases prior to attending the M-R programme. Within 7.2 months after M-R (range 1-14 months), 95% of the participants were practising robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and 25% of the RALP M-R participants had also performed robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Of the M-R participants, 38% availed themselves of the preceptor/proctor component of the programme; among these, 100% reported that they were performing RALP vs. only 92% of the MR participants who did not have a proctor experience. The 5 day length of the M-R was considered to be of satisfactory duration by 90% of the participants, while 1 participant considered it too brief and 1 considered it too long. All but one of the participants rated the M-R as a very or extremely valuable experience. All the M-R participants indicated that they would recommend this training programme to a colleague. Conclusions A 5 day intensive RALP M-R course seems to encourage postgraduate urologists, already familiar with laparoscopy, to successfully incorporate robotic surgery into their practice. The take rate, or the percentage of participants performing robotic-assisted surgery within 14 months after M-R, was 95%. Continued follow-up will ultimately determine the long-term effectiveness of this 1 week intensive training programme for postgraduate urologists. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |