Correlation between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure peak and fluctuation during the water drinking test in glaucoma patients

Autor: Marcelo Hatanaka, Remo Susanna Junior, Rafael Lacerda Furlanetto, Antonio Carlos Facio
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2010
Předmět:
Zdroj: Clinics, Vol 65, Iss 10, Pp 967-970 (2010)
Clinics; v. 65 n. 10 (2010); 967-970
Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 10 (2010); 967-970
Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 10 (2010); 967-970
Clinics
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
Clinics, Volume: 65, Issue: 10, Pages: 967-970, Published: 2010
ISSN: 1980-5322
1807-5932
Popis: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between central corneal thickness and outflow facility assessed by intraocular pressure peak and fluctuation during the water drinking test. METHODS: Fifty‐five newly diagnosed primary open‐angle glaucoma patients submitted to central corneal thickness measurements and water drinking test were enrolled in this retrospective study.;. Patients were divided into three groups according to their central corneal thickness. Pearson's Correlation test was performed in the groups with lower and higher pachymetric values. RESULTS: The mean age was 65,65 ± 28,28 years; 63,63% were female and 52,72% were caucasian. The mean central corneal thickness was 544,32 ± 36,86 µm, and the mean baseline intraocular pressure was 23,36 ± 6,26 mmHg. During the water drinking test, the mean intraocular pressure peak and mean intraocular pressure fluctuation were 30,43 ± 8,13 mmHg and 31,46 ± 18,46%, respectively. No relevant correlation was detected between the central corneal thickness and the intraocular pressure peak (r2 = 0,021) or between the central corneal thickness and the intraocular pressure fluctuation (r2 = 0,011). Group 1 presented a mean central corneal thickness of 505,81 ± 13,86 µm, and Group 3 was 583,55 ± 27,87 µm (p = 0,001). The mean intraocular pressure peak was 31,05 ± 9,05 mmHg and 27,83 ± 4,92 mmHg in Group 1 and in Group 3, respectively (p = 0,193). The difference of intraocular pressure fluctuation was not statistically significant between Group 1 (mean 28,47 ± 16,25%) and Group 3 (mean 33,27 ± 21,27%) (p = 0,43). CONCLUSION: In our case series, no correlation was found between central corneal thickness and water drinking test results.
Databáze: OpenAIRE