Brief group cognitive-behavioral intervention for temporomandibular disorders
| Autor: | Samuel F. Dworkin, Leanne Wilson, Coralyn Whitney, Kimberly H Huggins, Judith A. Turner, Donna Massoth, Jeffrey A. Burgess, Edmond L. Truelove, Earl Sommers |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1994 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Patient Dropouts medicine.medical_treatment law.invention Randomized controlled trial Double-Blind Method law Activities of Daily Living medicine Humans Somatoform Disorders Pain Measurement Intention-to-treat analysis Cognitive Behavioral Therapy business.industry Depression Chronic pain Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome medicine.disease Combined Modality Therapy Temporomandibular joint Clinical trial Cognitive behavioral therapy stomatognathic diseases Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine medicine.anatomical_structure Neurology Chronic Disease Physical therapy Female Neurology (clinical) business Somatization Psychosocial |
| Zdroj: | Pain. 59(2) |
| ISSN: | 0304-3959 |
| Popis: | Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are currently viewed as an interrelated set of clinical conditions presenting with signs and symptoms in masticatory and related muscles of the head and neck, and the soft tissue and bony components of the temporomandibular joint. Epidemiologic and clinical studies of TMD confirm its status as a chronic pain problem. In this report we present results from a randomized clinical trial which compared, at 3- and 12-month follow-ups, the effects of usual TMD treatment on TMD pain and related physical and psychological variables with the effects of a cognitive-behavioral (CB) intervention delivered to small groups of patients before usual TMD treatment began. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a minimal CB intervention followed by dental TMD treatment enhanced the effects of usual clinical dental treatment. A second purpose of the study was to determine whether patients classified as high in somatization and psychosocial dysfunction would respond less favorably to this minimal intervention than would those low in somatization and dysfunction. Patients who participated in the CB intervention followed by usual treatment showed greater long-term decreases in reported pain level and pain interference in daily activities than did patients who received only usual treatment. The benefits of CB intervention were not seen when the CB and UT groups were compared at 3-month follow-up. During the 3-12-month follow-up interval, however, the UT group maintained essentially the same level of improvement in characteristic pain while the CB group continued to improve, as hypothesized. During this same follow-up interval, the CB group also showed a strong trend toward continued improvement in pain interference. Such effects were not observed for depression, somatization, or clinical measures of jaw range of motion. Additionally, as hypothesized, dysfunctional chronic pain patients did not appear to benefit from the brief CB intervention. Intent to treat analyses were also performed to assess generalizability of the results. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|