The Effect of Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube Placement on Swallowing and Swallow-Related Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review
Autor: | Louis W. C. Liu, Andrew Hope, Brian O'Sullivan, Heather Flowers, Rosemary Martino, Stephanie M. Shaw |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Blinding medicine.medical_treatment Cochrane Library law.invention Speech and Hearing Enteral Nutrition Randomized controlled trial Swallowing law Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy Gastroscopy medicine Humans Intensive care medicine Feeding tube Gastrostomy Dehydration business.industry Malnutrition Gastroenterology Dysphagia Deglutition Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Neoplasms Quality of Life medicine.symptom Deglutition Disorders business |
Zdroj: | Dysphagia. 30:152-175 |
ISSN: | 1432-0460 0179-051X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00455-014-9592-z |
Popis: | Patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) often experience malnutrition and dehydration during treatment. As a result, some centres place PEG tubes prophylactically (pPEG) to prevent these negative consequences. However, recent research has suggested that pPEG use may negatively affect swallowing physiology, function and/or quality of life, especially in the long term. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on pPEG use in HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy and to determine its impact on swallowing-related outcomes. The following electronic databases were searched for all relevant primary research published through February 24, 2014: AMED, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Healthstar, Medline, and PsycINFO. Main search terms included HNC, radiotherapy, deglutition disorders, feeding tube(s), and prophylactic or elective. References for all accepted papers were hand searched to identify additional relevant research. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias. At all levels, two blinded raters provided judgments. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The search retrieved 181 unique citations. Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. Quality assessment revealed that all studies were at risk for bias due to non-randomized sampling and unreported or inadequate blinding. Ten studies demonstrated selection bias with significant baseline differences between pPEG patients and controls. Results regarding the frequency and severity of dysphagia and swallowing-related outcomes were varied and inconclusive. The impact of pPEG use on swallowing and swallowing-related outcomes remains unclear. Well-controlled, randomized trials are needed to determine if pPEG places patients at greater risk for developing long-term dysphagia. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |