Constructing identities: the implications of DTC ancestry testing for tribal communities
| Autor: | Hina Walajahi, Sara Chandros Hull, David R. Wilson |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Genetic genealogy
media_common.quotation_subject Identity (social science) Article Indigenous Politics Population Groups Sovereignty Direct-To-Consumer Screening and Testing Databases Genetic Kinship Humans Genetic Testing Sociology indigenous identity direct-to-consumer health care economics and organizations Genetics (clinical) media_common business.industry Native American Public relations Popularity empirical bioethics United States Pedigree Personal identity Indians North American commercial ancestry test business |
| Zdroj: | Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics |
| ISSN: | 1098-3600 |
| Popis: | Purpose: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic ancestry companies have rapidly increased in popularity, with top testing services maintaining genetic databases of several million consumers. While genetic ancestry tests are often characterized as recreational, companies invoke deeply personal concepts of individual identity, group membership, and kinship when marketing their services. In particular, many companies claim to be able to determine Native American heritage, claims that are not supported by the state of the science and may have significant cultural and political consequences for U.S. tribal communities. This study aims to fill the gaps in empirical work on this issue and characterize how genetic ancestry companies articulate indigenous identity through their marketing strategies. Methods: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of the public facing websites for 25 DTC genetic ancestry companies that offer services measuring Native American ancestry. Results: Our findings describe how genetic ancestry companies promote a causal relationship between genetics and self-identity through marketing language such as “Discover Yourself” and “Are you Native American?” and how this implicates U.S. tribal communities. Conclusion: Genetic ancestry company claims regarding genetic ancestry, personal identity, and cultural membership are problematic and challenge how U.S. tribal nations currently identify and create potential obstacles for tribal sovereignty. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink