Lachnocrepis LeConte 1853

Autor:	Guéorguiev, Borislav, Liang, Hongbin
Rok vydání:	2020
Předmět:	Coleoptera Oodes Insecta Arthropoda Animalia Biodiversity Carabidae Nothoodes Lachnocrepis Taxonomy
DOI:	10.5281/zenodo.4480039
Popis:	subgenus Lachnocrepis LeConte, 1853 [= Eulachnocrepis Habu, 1956] japonicus (Bates, 1873), comb. n. = piceolus Fairmare, 1887 parallelus Say, 1830 desertus Motschulsky, 1858 = prolixus Bates, 1873, syn. n. = hahni Reitter, 1908 genus Nothoodes gen. n. angustatus (Lorenz, 1998), comb. n. = parallelus LaFerté-Sénectere, 1851 [nec Say, 1830] bharat Guéorguiev & Liang, sp. n. longus (Andrewes, 1940), comb. n. taprobanae (Andrewes, 1923), comb. n. genus Oodes Bonelli, 1810, species incertae sedis amaroides Dejean, 1831 Note: The setation of submentum, feebly sinuate base of pronotum, prosternal process more narrowly rounded apically, median lobe in lateral aspect (resembling much that of taxa of the “ rambouseki ” group), and general structure of spermathecal complex suggest that the species may be a member of Pseudoodes. Judging by the prosternal process bordered apically and the undifferentiated, relatively short seminal canal, O. amaroides may belong to a separate species group of Pseudoodes. bostockii Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 congoensis Burgeon, 1935 denisonensis Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 fitzroyensis W.J. MacLeay, 1888 froggatti W.J. MacLeay, 1888 impressus Chaudoir, 1882 inornatus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 = proximus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 † kachinensis Liu, 2014 laevissimus (Chaudoir, 1882) = longior (Darlington, 1968) latior Csiki, 1931 = latus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 [nec LaFerté-Sénectere, 1851] lenis Péringuey, 1896 Note: Péringuey (1896: 532) stated that the elytral interval 3 of O. lenis has no setiferous puncture. This character state is incongruous with the diagnosis of the genus. The same author also noted another peculiar trait, “ head smooth, with two minute punctures above the basal part of the epistoma, which is hardly distinct ” (ibid.: 530, 532). However, last indication contradicts to that in other pages of the same publication. In the identification key proposed for the genera of the South African Oodini, Péringuey (ibid.) stated that Oodes falls among groups having “ Head with one seta over the posterior part of the eye ” (ibid.: 527), and in the generic diagnosis he affirmed—“ head subquadrate… with only one seta over the back part of the eye ” (ibid.: 529). All the Eurasian species of Oodes have single supraorbital setiferous puncture on each side of the head as well as O. congoensis and all American congeners (Bousquet 1996: 470; present study). In contrast, the Australian species O. bostocki, O. impressus, and O. modestus have two supraorbital pores (Sloane, 1910: 441; Darlington 1968: 31). The type material of O. lenis must be revised. modestus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 nil Darlington, 1968 oblongus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 = riverinae (W.J. MacLeay, 1873) = planipennis (W.J. MacLeay, 1878) par Darlington, 1968 palpalis Klug, 1853 Note: Most probably this taxon belongs to Brachyodes Jeannel, 1949. Chaudoir (1882: 359) compared it with his Oodes siamensis Chaudoir, 1882, a species subsequently placed in Brachyodes.Also, identifications of P. Basilewsky and Ch. Lecordier in MNHN showed that two specialists treated O. palpalis as belonging to Brachyodes and as a questionable synonym of Brachyodes natalensis (Chaudoir, 1882). In order to solve this problem, the primary types of Klug and Chaudoir must be compared. paroensis Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 parviceps Sloane, 1896 rossi Darlington, 1968 siccus Darlington, 1968 terrestris Darlington, 1971 = laevissimus Darlington, 1968 [non Chaudoir, 1882] trisulcatus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 waterhousei Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 = interioris Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 wilsoni Darlington, 1968 genus Nothoodes gen. n. angustatus (Lorenz, 1998), comb. n. = parallelus LaFerté-Sénectere, 1851 [nec Say, 1830] bharat Guéorguiev & Liang, sp. n. longus (Andrewes, 1940), comb. n. taprobanae (Andrewes, 1923), comb. n. genus Oodes Bonelli, 1810, species incertae sedis amaroides Dejean, 1831 Note: The setation of submentum, feebly sinuate base of pronotum, prosternal process more narrowly rounded apically, median lobe in lateral aspect (resembling much that of taxa of the “ rambouseki ” group), and general structure of spermathecal complex suggest that the species may be a member of Pseudoodes. Judging by the prosternal process bordered apically and the undifferentiated, relatively short seminal canal, O. amaroides may belong to a separate species group of Pseudoodes. bostockii Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 congoensis Burgeon, 1935 denisonensis Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 fitzroyensis W.J. MacLeay, 1888 froggatti W.J. MacLeay, 1888 impressus Chaudoir, 1882 inornatus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 = proximus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 † kachinensis Liu, 2014 laevissimus (Chaudoir, 1882) = longior (Darlington, 1968) latior Csiki, 1931 = latus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 [nec LaFerté-Sénectere, 1851] lenis Péringuey, 1896 Note: Péringuey (1896: 532) stated that the elytral interval 3 of O. lenis has no setiferous puncture. This character state is incongruous with the diagnosis of the genus. The same author also noted another peculiar trait, “ head smooth, with two minute punctures above the basal part of the epistoma, which is hardly distinct ” (ibid.: 530, 532). However, last indication contradicts to that in other pages of the same publication. In the identification key proposed for the genera of the South African Oodini, Péringuey (ibid.) stated that Oodes falls among groups having “ Head with one seta over the posterior part of the eye ” (ibid.: 527), and in the generic diagnosis he affirmed—“ head subquadrate… with only one seta over the back part of the eye ” (ibid.: 529). All the Eurasian species of Oodes have single supraorbital setiferous puncture on each side of the head as well as O. congoensis and all American congeners (Bousquet 1996: 470; present study). In contrast, the Australian species O. bostocki, O. impressus, and O. modestus have two supraorbital pores (Sloane, 1910: 441; Darlington 1968: 31). The type material of O. lenis must be revised. modestus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 nil Darlington, 1968 oblongus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 = riverinae (W.J. MacLeay, 1873) = planipennis (W.J. MacLeay, 1878) par Darlington, 1968 palpalis Klug, 1853 Note: Most probably this taxon belongs to Brachyodes Jeannel, 1949. Chaudoir (1882: 359) compared it with his Oodes siamensis Chaudoir, 1882, a species subsequently placed in Brachyodes.Also, identifications of P. Basilewsky and Ch. Lecordier in MNHN showed that two specialists treated O. palpalis as belonging to Brachyodes and as a questionable synonym of Brachyodes natalensis (Chaudoir, 1882). In order to solve this problem, the primary types of Klug and Chaudoir must be compared. paroensis Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 parviceps Sloane, 1896 rossi Darlington, 1968 siccus Darlington, 1968 terrestris Darlington, 1971 = laevissimus Darlington, 1968 [non Chaudoir, 1882] trisulcatus Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 waterhousei Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 = interioris Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 wilsoni Darlington, 1968 Published as part of Guéorguiev, Borislav & Liang, Hongbin, 2020, Revision of the Palaearctic and Oriental representatives of Lachnocrepis LeConte and Oodes Bonelli (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with special account on Chinese species, pp. 1-89 in Zootaxa 4850 (1) on pages 83-85, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4850.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4407072 {"references":["Habu, A. (1956) On the genera and species of the Oodini (Coleoptera, Carabidae) from Japan. The Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Series C, 6, 49 - 73.","Bates, H. W. (1873) On the geodephagous Coleoptera of Japan. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London for the year 1873, 1873, 219 - 322. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2311.1873. tb 00643. x","Motschulsky, V. de (1858) Litterature. Etudes Entomologiques, 7, 171 - 178.","Reitter, E. (1908) Fauna Germanica. Die Kafer des Deutschen Reiches. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. I. Band. Schriften des Deutschen Lehrervereins fur Naturkunde 22. K. G. Lutz, Stuttgart, viii + 248 pp., 40 pls.","Lorenz, W. (1998) Systematic list of extant ground beetles of the world (Insecta Coleoptera \" Geadephaga \": Trachypachidae and Carabidae incl. Paussinae, Cicindelinae, Rhysodinae). 1 st Edition. Published by the Author, Tutzing, [ii] + 502 pp.","LaFerte-Senectere, F. T. de (1851) Revision de la tribu des patellimanes de Dejean, coleopteres pentameres de la famille des carabiques. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Deuxieme Serie, 9, 209 - 294.","Andrewes, H. E. (1940) Keys to some Indian genera of Carabidae (Col.). X. The genus Oodes. The Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Series B, 9, 203 - 208. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 3113.1940. tb 00329. x","Andrewes, H. E. (1923) Descriptions of some new Carabidae from Ceylon. (Part I.). Spolia Zeylanica, 12, 223 - 251.","Chaudoir, M. de (1882) Monographie des oodides 1 re partie. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Series 6, 2, 317 - 378.","Liu, Y., Shi, H., Cai, Ch., Liang, H. & Huang, D. (2014) The first record of Cretaceous ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Oodini) from Burmese amber. Cretaceous Research, 52 (2015), 427 - 430. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. cretres. 2014.05.013","Darlington, P. J. Jr (1968) The carabid beetles of New Guinea Part III. Harpalinae (continued): Perigonini to Pseudomorphini. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 137 (1), 1 - 253. [http: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / part / 11926]","Csiki, E. (1931) Carabidae: Harpalinae V. In: Junk, W. & Schenkling, S. (Eds.), Coleopterorum catalogus. Pars 115. W. Junk, Berlin, pp. 739 - 1022.","Peringuey, L. (1896) Descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera of South Africa. Part II. Cicindelidae supplement. Carabidae. The Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society, 7, 99 - 623 + i-xiv.","Bousquet, Y. (1996) Taxonomic revision of Nearctic, Mexican, and West Indian Oodini (Coleoptera: Carabidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 128, 443 - 537. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 128443 - 3","Sloane, T. G. (1910) Revisional notes on Australian Carabidae. Part III. Tribes Oodini, Chlaeniini, and Sphodrini [Coleoptera]. The Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 35, 435 - 458.","Jeannel, R. (1949) ColeiopteIres carabiques de la reigion Malgache. Troisieme Partie. Faune de l'Empire Francais. IX. Office de la Recherche scientifique coloniale, Paris, 767 - 1146."]}
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::244f2ef5f33723cc7beb7a772ad2f8e5 Zobrazit plný text záznamu