Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones
Autor: | Guohua Zeng, Bing Liu, Wenqi Wu, M. Pilar Laguna, Tuo Deng, Jean de la Rosette, Yiwen Chen, Xiaolu Duan |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Urology, APH - Personalized Medicine, APH - Quality of Care |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Nephrology
medicine.medical_specialty Ureteral Calculi Blood transfusion Urology medicine.medical_treatment 030232 urology & nephrology MEDLINE Cochrane Library 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Internal medicine Humans Medicine Percutaneous nephrolithotomy business.industry Odds ratio Proximal Impacted Ureteral Stones Confidence interval Treatment Outcome 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Meta-analysis Systematic Review business Managements Meta-Analysis |
Zdroj: | World journal of urology, 37(8), 1687-1701. Springer Verlag |
ISSN: | 0724-4983 |
Popis: | Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for the management of proximal impacted ureteral stones (PIUS). Methods: A systematic literature search using Pubmed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to obtain studies concerning different managements for PIUS up to Jan 2018. Summary odds ratios (ORs), standard mean differences (SMDs) or weighted mean differences with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the efficacy and safety of all included treatment methods, registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018092745. Results: A total of 15 comparative studies with 1780 patients were included. Meta-analyses of final stone-free rate (SFR) favored percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) over ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) (OR 10.35; 95% CI 5.26–20.35; P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
načítá se...