Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in the context of high cervical cancer incidence and low screening coverage
Autor: | Terje Raud, Lee Padrik, Triin Võrno, Rainer Reile, Raul-Allan Kiivet, Oliver Nahkur, Anneli Uusküla, Katrin Lutsar |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Estonia medicine.medical_specialty Pediatrics Vaginal Neoplasms Adolescent Cost effectiveness Cost-Benefit Analysis Population Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Genital warts Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Humans Medicine Anal cancer Papillomavirus Vaccines 030212 general & internal medicine Child education health care economics and organizations Aged Aged 80 and over Gynecology Cervical cancer education.field_of_study Models Statistical General Veterinary General Immunology and Microbiology business.industry Incidence Papillomavirus Infections Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health HPV infection Middle Aged Anus Neoplasms medicine.disease Vaccination Oropharyngeal Neoplasms Regimen Infectious Diseases 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Molecular Medicine Female Mouth Neoplasms business |
Zdroj: | Vaccine. 35:6329-6335 |
ISSN: | 0264-410X |
Popis: | Background Estonia has high cervical cancer incidence and low screening coverage. We modelled the impact of population-based bivalent, quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening. Methods A Markov cohort model of the natural history of HPV infection was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating a cohort of 12-year-old girls with bivalent, quadrivalent or nonavalent vaccine in two doses in a national, school-based vaccination programme. The model followed the natural progression of HPV infection into subsequent genital warts (GW); premalignant lesions (CIN 1–3); cervical, oropharyngeal, vulvar, vaginal and anal cancer. Vaccine coverage was assumed to be 70%. A time horizon of 88 years (up to 100 years of age) was used to capture all lifetime vaccination costs and benefits. Costs and utilities were discounted using an annual discount rate of 5%. Results Vaccination of 12-year-old girls alongside screening compared to screening alone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €14,007 (bivalent), €14,067 (quadrivalent) and €11,633 (nonavalent) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in the base-case scenario and ranged between €5367–21,711, €5142–21,800 and €4563–18,142, respectively, in sensitivity analysis. The results were most sensitive to changes in discount rate, vaccination regimen, vaccine prices and cervical cancer screening coverage. Conclusion Vaccination of 12-year-old girls alongside current cervical cancer screening can be considered a cost-effective intervention in Estonia. Adding HPV vaccination to the national immunisation schedule is expected to prevent a considerable number of HPV infections, genital warts, premalignant lesions, HPV related cancers and deaths. Although in our model ICERs varied slightly depending on the vaccine used, they generally fell within the same range. Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination was found to be most dependent on vaccine cost and duration of vaccine immunity, but not on the type of vaccine used. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |