Eur Spine J
Autor: | Salmi Louis-Rachid, Côté Pierre, Cedraschi Christine, Campello Marco |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Bordeaux population health (BPH), Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie et de Développement (ISPED)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Activities of daily living medicine.medical_treatment media_common.quotation_subject Social issues 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine IETO Activities of Daily Living Humans Medicine Disabled Persons Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Qualitative Research media_common 030222 orthopedics Teamwork Rehabilitation business.industry Focus Groups Focus group Low back pain 3. Good health Therapeutic relationship Family medicine Surgery [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie medicine.symptom business Low Back Pain 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Qualitative research |
Zdroj: | European Spine Journal European Spine Journal, Springer Verlag, 2020, 29 (8), pp.1953-1958. ⟨10.1007/s00586-020-06463-y⟩ |
ISSN: | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00586-020-06463-y⟩ |
Popis: | Purpose For clinicians, treating the cause of non-pathological low back pain (LBP) is central. For patients, it is how LBP limits their activities of daily living. Little is known about clinicians’ understanding of disability and the patient’s perspective. We conducted a qualitative study to examine how clinicians involved in the care of patients with BP describe and define disability, its associated changes, and rehabilitation. Methods Two focus groups (FGs) were conducted with spine specialists including eleven confirmed orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons, ten advanced residents, and five other clinicians. Participants were questioned about their views on disability, what it means to them and to the patients. Responses were collected by two independent observers using Metaplan techniques. Large stickers were used to collect participants’ responses/ideas; the stickers were posted on billboards so the FGs could check them during the discussion. Metaplan was used to aggregate responses. Results Disability was viewed as a major source of physical limitations, difficulties in performing daily activities, associated with emotional distress, and raising legitimacy issues. Changes in roles engaged the social component. Considered from the patients’ perspective, negative emotions and social issues were emphasized, along with the patients’ resources. For rehabilitation, the participants emphasized patient-centered care, teamwork, and objectives for care. Conclusion The participants pointed to disability as an umbrella term for impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. They underlined the necessity for clinicians to help patients define their level of optimal functioning when faced with BP, utilizing adaptation and teamwork within the therapeutic relationship. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |