Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives
| Autor: | Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Ortwin Renn, Wolfgang Kröger, Klaus Lucas, Manfred Dietrich Laubichler, Jochen Schanze, Roland W. Scholz |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Sustainability Governance
risk governance 0211 other engineering and technologies 02 engineering and technology 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Good governance Argument Physiology (medical) Interdisciplinary integration properties of systemic risks systemic risk Systemic risk Safety Risk Reliability and Quality Risk management 0105 earth and related environmental sciences 021110 strategic defence & security studies Risk Management business.industry Corporate governance Risk governance Harm Risk analysis (engineering) ddc:300 Business interdisciplinarity integration Risk assessment Transdisciplinary studies |
| Zdroj: | Risk analysis Risk Analysis, 42 (9) Renn, O, Laubichler, M, Lucas, K, Kröger, W, Schanze, J, Scholz, R W & Schweizer, P 2022, ' Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives ', Risk Analysis, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1902-1920 . https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13657 Risk analysis 42(9), 1902-1920 (2020). doi:10.1111/risa.13657 special issue: "Special Series: Systemic Risks" |
| ISSN: | 1539-6924 0272-4332 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/risa.13657 |
| Popis: | Systemic risks are characterized by high complexity, multiple uncertainties, major ambiguities, and transgressive effects on other systems outside of the system of origin. Due to these characteristics, systemic risks are overextending established risk management and create new, unsolved challenges for policymaking in risk assessment and risk governance. Their negative effects are often pervasive, impacting fields beyond the obvious primary areas of harm. This article addresses these challenges of systemic risks from different disciplinary and sectorial perspectives. It highlights the special contributions of these perspectives and approaches and provides a synthesis for an interdisciplinary understanding of systemic risks and effective governance. The main argument is that understanding systemic risks and providing good governance advice relies on an approach that integrates novel modeling tools from complexity sciences with empirical data from observations, experiments, or simulations and evidence-based insights about social and cultural response patterns revealed by quantitative (e.g., surveys) or qualitative (e.g., participatory appraisals) investigations. Systemic risks cannot be easily characterized by single numerical estimations but can be assessed by using multiple indicators and including several dynamic gradients that can be aggregated into diverse but coherent scenarios. Lastly, governance of systemic risks requires interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral cooperation, a close monitoring system, and the engagement of scientists, regulators, and stakeholders to be effective as well as socially acceptable. Risk Analysis, 42 (9) ISSN:0272-4332 ISSN:1539-6924 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text