Early postoperative complications after gastric bypass revisional surgery in patients with previous sleeve gastrectomy versus primary gastric bypass

Autor: Carlos Felipe Campo-Betancourth, Sergio Ortiz Sebastián, José Luis Estrada Caballero, Clara Llopis Torremocha, Celia Villodre Tudela, Emilio Ruiz de la Cuesta García-Tapia, Esther Gracia Alegría, Silvia Carbonell Morote, Esteban Salas Rezola, Karina Cárdenas Jaén, Pedro Zapater, Carmen Bernabéu Aguirre, José Manuel Ramia Ángel
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 18(10)
ISSN: 1878-7533
Popis: Revisional bariatric surgery (RS) is indicated if there is weight regain or insufficient weight loss, no improvement or reappearance of co-morbidities, or previous bariatric surgery complications. It has been associated with higher postoperative morbidity.To evaluate the early postoperative complications (lt;30 d) of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RS (RYGB-RS) after primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG-1) compared with primary RYGB (RYGB-1) at a bariatric surgery referral center.Department of General and Digestive Surgery of General Universitary Hospital of Alicante, Spain.Retrospective cohort study comparing RYGB-RS after SG-1 and RYGB-1 between January 2008 and March 2021. Postoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality, and readmissions were analyzed.Six hundred and twenty-eight RYGB surgeries (48 RYGB-RS, 580 RYGB-1) were studied. The mean age of patients undergoing RYGB-RS was 50 years, compared with 46 years in the RYGB-1 group (P = .017). Mean initial body mass index was 44.2 kg/msup2/sup(RYGB-RS) versus 47.6 kg/msup2/sup(RYGB-1; P = .004). Cardiovascular risk factors were higher in the RYGB-1 group (Plt; .05). Indications for RS were weight regain or insufficient weight loss (72.9%), weight regain or insufficient weight loss plus gastroesophageal reflux disease (14.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (12.5%). There were no differences in the frequency of complications (RYGB-RS 22.9% vs RYGB-1 20.5%) or in their severity (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa; RYGB-RS 10.4% vs RYGB-1 6.4%; Pgt; .05). There were no differences in emergency room visits (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 14.9%) or in readmissions (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 9.4%).No differences were observed between primary RYGB and revisional RYGB in early morbidity, mortality, emergencies, or readmissions. Revisional bariatric surgery is a safe procedure at referral centers and must be done by expert hands.
Databáze: OpenAIRE