How in silico and QSAR approaches can increase confidence in environmental hazard and risk assessment
| Autor: | Paul Thomas, Pascal Bicherel, Franklin J. Bauer |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Value (ethics)
Reverse engineering Quantitative structure–activity relationship 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Computer science In silico Credence Geography Planning and Development Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship General Medicine 010501 environmental sciences Hazard analysis computer.software_genre 01 natural sciences Risk Assessment Rule of thumb Risk analysis (engineering) Computer Simulation Environmental Pollutants Risk assessment computer 0105 earth and related environmental sciences General Environmental Science Environmental Monitoring |
| Zdroj: | Integrated environmental assessment and management. 15(1) |
| ISSN: | 1551-3793 |
| Popis: | In silico methods are typically underrated in the current risk assessment paradigm, as evidenced by the recent document from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) on animal alternatives, in which quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) were practically used only as a last resort. Their primary use is still to provide supporting evidence for read-across strategies or to add credence to experimental results of unknown or limited validity (old studies, studies without good laboratory practices [GLPs], limited information reported, etc.) in hazard assessment, but under the pressure of increasing burdens of testing, industry and regulators alike are at last warming to them. Nevertheless, their true potential for data-gap filling and for resolving sticking points in risk assessment methodology and beyond has yet to be recognized. We postulate that it is possible to go beyond the level of simply increasing confidence to the point of using in silico approaches to accurately predict results that cannot be resolved analytically. For example, under certain conditions it is possible to obtain meaningful results by in silico extrapolation for tests that would be technically impossible to conduct in the laboratory or at least extremely challenging to obtain reliable results. The following and other concepts are explored in this article: the mechanism of action (MechoA) of the substance should be determined, as an aid verifying that the QSAR model is applicable to the substance under review; accurate QSARs should be built with high-quality data that were not only curated but also validated with expert judgment; although a rule of thumb for acute to chronic ratios appears applicable for nonpolar narcotics, it seems unlikely that a "one-value-fits-all" answer exists for other MechoAs; a holistic approach to QSARs can be employed (via reverse engineering) to help validate or invalidate an experimental endpoint value on the basis of multiple experimental studies. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;15:40-50. © 2018 SETAC. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text