Are you better off than you were 4 years ago? Measuring the impact of the ABS flexible endoscopy curriculum
Autor: | Jordan Grubbs, Kareem R. AbdelFattah, Deborah Farr, Sara A. Hennessy, Abier Abdelnaby, Joshua J. Weis, Daniel J. Scott |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Complete data Certification 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Flexible endoscopy medicine Humans Medical physics Curriculum Academic year medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Internship and Residency Endoscopy United States General Surgery 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Surgery Clinical Competence Board certification Surgical endoscopy business Academic program |
Zdroj: | Surgical Endoscopy. 34:4110-4114 |
ISSN: | 1432-2218 0930-2794 |
Popis: | In 2014, the ABS introduced the Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum (FEC). The FEC did not alter the minimum defined category case volumes for endoscopy; however, it did introduce specific cognitive and technical milestones for endoscopy training. It also mandated that residents pass the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Skills (FES) exam to qualify for board certification. Although significant research has been published regarding residents’ success on the FES exam, very little is known regarding how the FEC has changed the way general surgery programs train their residents in surgical endoscopy. The aim of this study was to quantify changes in flexible endoscopy education at a large academic program in the 4 years since the FEC was published. We classified the impact of FEC into four categories: (a) case volume or distribution, (b) clinical rotations, (c) required didactics or simulation exercises, and (d) FES pass rates. For category (a), we reviewed current and historical case logs for all categorical residents from 2013 to 2018. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare endoscopy volumes for each PGY level in 2013–2014 to the respective PGY level in 2017–2018 with p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |