Factors Affecting Retention of Estradiol-17β Silicone Rubber Implants in Ears of Steers
| Autor: | L. H. Carroll, N. G. Elliston, J. F. Wagner, T. H. Ferguson, J. C. Parrott, H. P. Grueter, J. W. McAskill, R. P. Basson, P. E. Gorham |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1985 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.drug_class Silicones Dentistry Oxytetracycline Insertion site Audiology Silicone rubber chemistry.chemical_compound Antiseptic otorhinolaryngologic diseases Genetics Animals Medicine Estradiol 17β Drug Implants Infection Control Estradiol business.industry Clean ears Ear General Medicine Anti-Bacterial Agents Oxytetracycline Hydrochloride chemistry Cattle Animal Science and Zoology Tight skin Implant business Food Science |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Animal Science. 61:807-813 |
| ISSN: | 1525-3163 0021-8812 |
| DOI: | 10.2527/jas1985.614807x |
| Popis: | A series of trials were conducted to identify the factors causing loss of estradiol-17 beta (E2-beta) silicone rubber implants from the ears of cattle and to evaluate methods of reducing this loss. Surface application of cattle feces to the ears before implanting resulted in an increase in loss of implants compared with the loss from dry, clean ears (30.6 vs 8.6%; P less than .05). Washing ears with a povidone-iodine antiseptic solution before implanting or treating implant sites with an antibiotic after implanting reduced (P less than .05) implant loss when ears were coated with the fecal slurry. Coating silicone rubber implants with .5 to 2 mg of oxytetracycline hydrochloride (OTC) reduced (P less than .0001) implant loss from 39.8 to 13.8% when ears were coated with fecal slurry. When silicone rubber implants with a 1.5-mg coating of OTC were implanted in cattle before submerging in a dipping vat, implant loss was reduced from 6.2 to 2.7%. In studies designed to evaluate mechanical factors affecting implant loss, implants that were placed in the middle of the ear in tight skin moved .79 cm toward the insertion site during a 14-d period after administration compared with 2.82 cm when placed in the base of the ear. When placed in the middle of the ear in tight skin, only 2 of 399 (.5%) implants were lost from steers submerged in a dipping vat immediately following implantation compared with 42 of 394 (10.7%) when placed in the base of the ear (P less than .0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|