Biweekly vinorelbine and gemcitabine as second-line treatment and beyond in non-small cell lung cancer

Autor: Petros Karakitsos, Ekaterini Chatzaki, Nikolaos Xenidis, K. Neanidis, E. Chamalidou, Stylianos Kakolyris, P. Prassopoulos, D. Mikroulis, K. Amarantidis, Leonidas Chelis
Rok vydání: 2009
Předmět:
Zdroj: Chemotherapy. 56(5)
ISSN: 1421-9794
Popis: Background: To evaluate the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine (GEM) in combination with vinorelbine (VRL) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Fifteen patients with advanced NSCLC who had disease progression after a cisplatin- or taxane-based front-line regimen were enrolled into a 2-stage design trial and were treated with VRL 30 mg/m2 i.v. for 10 min followed by GEM 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. for 30 min on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Chemotherapy was given for 6 cycles unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was seen. The patients’ median age was 64 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 (n = 7), 1 (n = 5), and 2 (n = 3). The treatment was second line for 10 (67%) and third line or more for 5 (33%) patients. Results: No complete or partial responses were observed. Stable disease was seen in 4 (27%) patients and progressive disease in 11 (73%). The median time to tumor progression was 3 months (range 1–12) and the median survival was 4 months (range 2–31). Severe myelotoxicity was infrequent. Grade 2 neutropenia was observed in 2 (13%) patients, grade 2 thrombocytopenia in 1 (7%), and grade 2 anemia in 3 (20%). Nonhematologic toxicities were very mild and easily manageable. Conclusion: The GEM plus VRL combination at the present doses and schedule is a safe but ineffective regimen; therefore, it is not recommended as second-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Databáze: OpenAIRE