A phase I/II study of eribulin mesilate (ERI) plus irinotecan (IRI) in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors

Autor: Ana Sastre Urgelles, Rachael Scott, Christof M. Kramm, Franco Locatelli, Yan Jia, Udo Kontny, Francisco Bautista, D. R. D'Adamo, Michela Casanova, Claudio Favre, Jagadeesh Aluri, Raquel Hladun Alvaro, Dirk Reinhardt
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 38:10535-10535
ISSN: 1527-7755
0732-183X
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.10535
Popis: 10535 Background: ERI is an inhibitor of microtubule dynamics. IRI is used to treat pediatric sarcomas. In the pediatric preclinical testing program, ERI was well tolerated and had promising activity compared with vincristine (a common chemotherapeutic for pediatric cancers) for various solid tumors ( in vivo xenograft panels). Methods: Children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors (excluding active central nervous system tumors) were enrolled. Prior treatment with IRI was allowed. Dose escalation was conducted for 2 schedules with the primary objective (phase 1) of determining the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose: (A) ERI 1.4 mg/m2 IV infusion (Days 1 + 8 of 21-day cycle) + IRI 20 or 40 mg/m2 IV infusion (Days 1–5 of 21-day cycle); (B) ERI 1.4 mg/m2 IV infusion (Days 1 + 8 of 21-day cycle) + IRI 100 or 125 mg/m2 IV infusion (Days 1 + 8 of 21-day cycle). Safety and pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed. Results: 13 patients (pts) were enrolled (median age: 9 years [range: 3–17]); 4 pts had rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), 2 had non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma, 2 had Ewing sarcoma, 2 had hepatoblastoma, 2 had nephroblastoma, and 1 had neuroblastoma. Overall, 7 pts previously received IRI. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported for either schedule. At data cut-off (July 14, 2019), 4 pts (with Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma, RMS, or hepatoblastoma) continued treatment (A, n = 2; B, n = 2) and 9 pts discontinued treatment (primarily for radiographic progression, n = 7 [A, n = 4; B, n = 3]). All pts experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); the most common any grade TEAE was neutropenia (n = 10; A, n = 5; B, n = 5). 11 pts had grade ≥3 TEAEs (A, n = 6; B, n = 5); the most frequent grade ≥3 TEAE was neutropenia (n = 9; A, n = 5; B, n = 4). No pt withdrew ERI or IRI due to an AE; 3 pts had dose reductions for ERI (A, n = 1; B, n = 2) and 3 pts had dose interruption of ERI (A, n = 2; B, n = 1) due to AEs. No pt had dose reductions for IRI, and 3 pts had dose interruption of IRI (A, n = 2; B, n = 1) due to AEs. 3 deaths occurred; 2 deaths were the result of tumor progression (A, n = 1; B, n = 1), and the cause of 1 was unknown (B). 1 pt with neuroblastoma treated according to schedule A had a partial response. Systemic exposures of ERI, IRI, and SN-38 (IRI active metabolite) were similar between schedules and doses. Conclusions: No DLTs were observed. Toxicity was manageable. Administration of IRI treatment on Days 1–5 is widely used in pediatric cancers; enrollment for phase 2 is ongoing with treatment Schedule A (ERI 1.4 mg/m2 Days 1 + 8 of 21-day cycle; IRI 40 mg/m2 Days 1–5 of 21-day cycle). Clinical trial information: NCT03245450.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: