A Comparative Analysis of Eating Behavior of School Aged Children with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and their Caregivers Quality of Life: Perspectives of Caregivers
| Autor: | Jonathan A. Hemler, Sari Acra, Elizabeth Kennedy, Girish Hiremath, Elizabeth Rogers |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Affect (psychology) Article 030507 speech-language pathology & audiology 03 medical and health sciences Speech and Hearing 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life (healthcare) Swallowing Surveys and Questionnaires Medicine Humans Eosinophilic esophagitis Child Eating problems School age child business.industry digestive oral and skin physiology Gastroenterology Eosinophilic Esophagitis Feeding Behavior medicine.disease Otorhinolaryngology Caregivers Case-Control Studies Quality of Life Eating behavior Female 0305 other medical science business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Dysphagia |
| Popis: | Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) can affect eating behavior in infants and children and this may lead to stressful interactions with their caregivers and potentially impact their caregivers' quality of life. Clinical evaluation of eating behaviors can be time consuming and burdensome. Caregivers can provide a comprehensive assessment of their child’s eating behavior; however, this has not been well studied in children with EoE. In a case–control study, we used Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ) to compare caregivers' perception of eating behaviors in children (ages 11 ± 4 years; Mean ± SD) with EoE (cEoE; N = 42) to that of non-EoE controls (cControls; N = 38), and Feeding/Swallowing Impact on Children’s Caregivers Questionnaire (FS-IS) to examine the impact of EoE-related eating problems on their caregivers' quality of life. There were no differences between the cEoE and cControls perceptions of eating behaviors as assessed by CEBQ. In FS-IS, the cEoE indicated that they were worried about the way their child would breathe or if the child would choke while feeding (2.28 ± 0.16 vs. 1.25 ± 0.13; p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|