Specifying information needs: improving the working methodology

Autor: Jos G. Timmerman, Joop de Boer, W. H. Mulder, Matthijs Hisschemöller
Přispěvatelé: Institute for Environmental Studies
Rok vydání: 2001
Předmět:
Zdroj: Timmerman, J G, de Boer, J, Hisschemoller, M & Mulder, W H 2001, ' Specifying information needs: Improving the working methodology ', Regional Environmental Change, vol. 2, pp. 77-84 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s101130100030
Regional Environmental Change, 2, 77-84. Springer
ISSN: 1436-3798
DOI: 10.1007/s101130100030
Popis: Specification of information needs is an important step in the design of monitoring networks. Within the framework of Monitoring Strategy 2000+, a programme of the Dutch Directorate General of Public Works and Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat) which seeks to provide innovation in the monitoring sector, a method has been developed to link water management policy to monitoring through specification of information needs. Over the past 2 years, this method has been applied in several projects within the Rijkswaterstaat organisation. Use of this method has led to improvements in the monitoring practice and was judged very positively by the people involved. Nevertheless, the main obstacle to employing the method was the actual translation of policy matters into information products. A special study is carried out, focusing on this aspect within the method, to provide the participants of a project with a mental framework that enables them to clearly specify their information needs. The major requirements for this mental framework are that all participants have a clear view of the process (system), and that they are able to relate their contribution to this process and to the contributions of others (transparency). The first step of the process is to focus the attention of stakeholders on the information they will actually need for decision-making. The next step is to confront the different expressed opinions through the method of the 'devil's advocate', which implies criticising the results of the first step by finding as many as possible arguments against these opinions. This should force the stakeholders to better specify their arguments. The method, its improvements and the results of one pilot project will be discussed in this paper.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: