Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer
| Autor: | Francisco Pastor-Pascual, Robert Montés-Micó, Salvador Aguilar-Córcoles, Cristina Tello-Elordi, Pedro Tañá-Rivero |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Biometry Anterior Chamber Scheimpflug principle law.invention Cornea 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Optical coherence tomography Lens thickness law Ophthalmology medicine Humans Prospective Studies Mathematics Keratometer medicine.diagnostic_test Limits of agreement Significant difference Reproducibility of Results Sensory Systems Axial Length Eye Interferometry Spain 030221 ophthalmology & optometry Surgery Tomography Optical Coherence 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Partial coherence |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 47:488-495 |
| ISSN: | 1873-4502 0886-3350 |
| Popis: | PURPOSE To evaluate the agreement between different parameters obtained with 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based biometers and 1 Scheimpflug camera with partial coherence interferometry (PCI). SETTING Single center, Oftalvist, Alicante, Spain. DESIGN Prospective case series. METHODS Biometry was performed in 49 eyes using 3 optical biometers: ANTERION SS-OCT, IOLMaster 700 SS-OCT, and Pentacam AXL PCI. Keratometry (K), J0 and J45 vectors, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white (WTW), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were measured with each device. Bland-Altman analysis was applied. RESULTS This study comprises 49 eyes of 49 patients. There were no statistically significant differences for K1, K2, J0 and J45 between the 3 devices (P > .9). In contrast, there was a statistically significant difference in the ACD, CCT, WTW, LT, and AL between the biometers (P < .001). Specifically, there was a statistically significant difference between ACD, CCT, and WTW values for all-pairwise comparisons. IOLMaster showed the shortest ACD value and ANTERION showed the largest ACD. IOLMaster showed the highest CCT and Pentacam showed the lowest CCT. IOLMaster showed the largest WTW and Pentacam showed the shortest WTW. The LT measured with IOLMaster was thicker than that measured with ANTERION. There was a statistically significant difference in the AL between IOLMaster and Pentacam, with a shorter AL measured with IOLMaster (P < .001), but no differences were found between ANTERION and IOLMaster (P = .599) and between ANTERION and Pentacam (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS Mean differences and the limits of agreement obtained in all-pairwise comparisons of the different parameters should be judged clinically to consider the interchangeability of these devices. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|