The role of soil pH on soil carbonic anhydrase activity

Autor: Joana Sauze, Samuel P. Jones, Lisa Wingate, Steven Wohl, Jérôme Ogée
Přispěvatelé: Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro), European Project: 338264,EC:FP7:ERC,ERC-2013-StG,SOLCA(2014)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences, European Geosciences Union, 2018, 15 (2), pp.597-612. ⟨10.5194/bg-15-597-2018⟩
Biogeosciences, Vol 15, Pp 597-612 (2018)
Biogeosciences 2 (15), 597-612. (2018)
ISSN: 1726-4170
1726-4189
DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-597-2018⟩
Popis: Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are metalloenzymes present in plants and microorganisms that catalyse the interconversion of CO2 and water to bicarbonate and protons. Because oxygen isotopes are also exchanged during this reaction, the presence of CA also modifies the contribution of soil and plant CO18O fluxes to the global budget of atmospheric CO18O. The oxygen isotope signatures (δ18O) of these fluxes differ as leaf water pools are usually more enriched than soil water pools, and this difference is used to partition the net CO2 flux over land into soil respiration and plant photosynthesis. Nonetheless, the use of atmospheric CO18O as a tracer of land surface CO2 fluxes requires a good knowledge of soil CA activity. Previous studies have shown that significant differences in soil CA activity are found in different biomes and seasons, but our understanding of the environmental and ecological drivers responsible for the spatial and temporal patterns observed in soil CA activity is still limited. One factor that has been overlooked so far is pH. Soil pH is known to strongly influence microbial community composition, richness and diversity in addition to governing the speciation of CO2 between the different carbonate forms. In this study we investigated the CO2–H2O isotopic exchange rate (kiso) in six soils with pH varying from 4.5 to 8.5. We also artificially increased the soil CA concentration to test how pH and other soil properties (texture and phosphate content) affected the relationship between kiso and CA concentration. We found that soil pH was the primary driver of kiso after CA addition and that the chemical composition (i.e. phosphate content) played only a secondary role. We also found an offset between the δ18O of the water pool with which CO2 equilibrates and total soil water (i.e. water extracted by vacuum distillation) that varied with soil texture. The reasons for this offset are still unknown.
Databáze: OpenAIRE