Comparative evaluation of surface properties of enamel and different esthetic restorative materials under erosive and abrasive challenges: An in vitro study
| Autor: | Rajneesh Kumar, Shinam Pasricha, Pranav Gupta, Simranjeet Kaur, Sameer Makkar |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Abrasion (dental)
Materials science Enamel paint business.industry Composite number Abrasive Glass ionomer cement Dentistry nanofilled composite soft drink medicine.disease Microfilled composite resin modified glass ionomer cement Comparative evaluation stomatognathic system visual_art medicine visual_art.visual_art_medium In vitro study tooth brush Original Article Tooth surface loss business |
| Zdroj: | Indian Journal of Dentistry |
| ISSN: | 2213-3666 0975-962X |
| Popis: | Introduction: Noncarious tooth surface loss is a normal physiological process occurring throughout the life, but it can often become a problem affecting function, esthetics or cause pain. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of erosive and abrasive challenges on the surface microhardness and surface wear of enamel and three different restorative materials, that is, nanofilled composite, microfilled composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) by using Vickers microhardness tester and profilometer respectively. Subjects and Methods: Nanofilled composite (Filtek ™ Z350 × T), microfilled composite (Heliomolar ® ) and RMGIC (Fuji II LC) were used in the study. Results: Nanofilled composite resin has the best resistance to erosion and/or abrasion among all the materials tested, followed by microfilled composite and RMGIC respectively. Conclusion: Toothbrush abrasion has a synergistic effect with erosion on substance loss of human enamel, composites, and RMGIC. The susceptibility to acid and/or toothbrush abrasion of human enamel was higher compared to restorative materials. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|