Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
Autor: | E. Van Limbergen, J. P. De Greve, M. Goossens, C. Van Ongeval, Patrick Martens, I. De Brabander, Eliane Kellen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Medical Oncology, Medical Genetics, Clinical sciences, Laboratory of Molecular and Medical Oncology |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Cancer Research
IMPACT Breast cancer mortality Population Breast Neoplasms Cancer detection lcsh:RC254-282 MAMMOGRAPHY 03 medical and health sciences Breast cancer screening 0302 clinical medicine Belgium Genetics medicine QUALITY Humans Mass Screening Mammography Registries 030212 general & internal medicine education Early Detection of Cancer Aged RISK education.field_of_study Science & Technology medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Middle Aged lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens language.human_language Cancer registry Benchmarking Flemish Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis language Female Performance indicator business Life Sciences & Biomedicine Delivery of Health Care Research Article Follow-Up Studies Demography |
Zdroj: | BMC Cancer, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2019) BMC Cancer |
ISSN: | 1471-2407 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12885-019-6230-z |
Popis: | Background We examined 15 years of key performance indicators (KPIs) of the population-based mammography screening programme (PMSP) in Flanders, Belgium. Methods Individual screening data were linked to the national cancer registry to obtain oncological follow-up. We benchmarked crude KPI results against KPI-targets set by the European guidelines and KPI results of other national screening programmes. Temporal trends were examined by plotting age-standardised KPIs against the year of screening and estimating the Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC). Results PMSP coverage increased significantly over the period of 15 years (+ 7.5% AAPC), but the increase fell to + 1.6% after invitation coverage was maximised. In 2016, PMSP coverage was at 50.0% and opportunistic coverage was at 14.1%, resulting in a total coverage by screening of 64.2%. The response to the invitations was 49.8% in 2016, without a trend. Recall rate decreased significantly (AAPC -1.5% & -5.0% in initial and subsequent regular screenings respectively) while cancer detection remained stable (AAPC 0.0%). The result was an increased positive predictive value (AAPC + 3.8%). Overall programme sensitivity was stable and was at 65.1% in 2014. In initial screens of 2015, the proportion of DCIS, tumours stage II+, and node negative invasive cancers was 18.2, 31.2, and 61.6% respectively. In subsequent regular screens of 2015, those proportions were 14.0, 24.8, and 65.4% respectively. Trends were not significant. Conclusion Besides a suboptimal attendance rate, most KPIs in the Flemish PMSP meet EU benchmark targets. Nonetheless, there are several priorities for further investigation such as a critical evaluation of strategies to increase screening participation, organising a biennial radiological review of interval cancers, analysing the effect that preceding opportunistic screening has on the KPI for initial screenings, and efforts to estimate the impact on breast cancer mortality. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |