Frontal Behavioural Inventory in the differential diagnosis of dementia

Autor: Alfredo Postiglione, Paolo Sorrentino, Graziella Milan, Alessandro Iavarone, Filomena Galeone, Elisa Loré, C. De Falco, Francesco Lamenza
Přispěvatelé: Milan, G, Lamenza, F, Iavarone, A, Galeone, F, Lorè, E, de Falco, C, Sorrentino, P, Postiglione, Alfredo
Rok vydání: 2008
Předmět:
Zdroj: Acta neurologica Scandinavica 117 (2008): 260–265.
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Milan G; Lamenza F; Iavarone A; Galeone F; Lore E; de Falco C; Sorrentino P; Postiglione A/titolo:Frontal Behavioural Inventory in the differential diagnosis of dementia/doi:/rivista:Acta neurologica Scandinavica/anno:2008/pagina_da:260/pagina_a:265/intervallo_pagine:260–265/volume:117
ISSN: 1600-0404
0001-6314
Popis: Objective – To evaluate diagnostic properties of the Frontal Behavioural Inventory (FBI) in patients suffering from different forms of dementia. Methods – The FBI was administered with other psychometric tests investigating cognitive performances and behavioral scales to the caregivers of 35 patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia (fv-FTD), 22 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and 15 with vascular dementia (VaD). All patients were comparable for degree of dementia severity and level of executive impairment. Results – The FBI showed high concurrent validity, internal consistency and good inter-rater and test–retest reliability. The discriminant validity was also very high. A new FBI cut-off score of 23 gave 97% sensitivity and 95% specificity in distinguishing fv-FTD from non-FTD patients. Conversely, the Neuropsychiatic Inventory (NPI) score was unable to differentiate fv-FTD from AD. Conclusions – The FBI is a neurobehavioral tool suitable to distinguish fv-FTD from other forms of dementia also when data from cognitive testing or other behavioral scales fail to support the differential diagnosis.
Databáze: OpenAIRE