Le recueil en routine de données de santé perçue à l’ère du paiement à la qualité : préconisations de la Commission épidémiologie et santé publique de la SFNDT
Autor: | Florence Sens, Olivier Moranne, Carole Ayav, Thierry Lobbedez, Bénédicte Sautenet, Cécile Couchoud |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Centre d'investigation clinique - Epidémiologie clinique [Nancy] (CIC-EC), Centre d'investigation clinique [Nancy] (CIC), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Agence de la biomédecine [Saint-Denis la Plaine], Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation rénale [CHU Caen], Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-CHU Caen, Normandie Université (NU)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Hôpital Edouard Herriot [CHU - HCL], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), MethodS in Patients-centered outcomes and HEalth ResEarch (SPHERE), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Nantes - UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours), Commission épidémiologie et santé publique de la Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation, Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université de Tours, Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse, CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux]-Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin, CCSD, Accord Elsevier |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Forfait
medicine.medical_specialty media_common.quotation_subject Compromise [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] 030232 urology & nephrology Commission Santé perçue 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life Nursing Health care Epidemiology medicine Evaluation « Patient Reported Outcomes Measures » media_common Perceived health Patient reported experience measures business.industry Public health Patient reported outcomes measures Payment « Patient Reported Experience Measures » 3. Good health [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio] Capitation system Feeling Nephrology Évaluation business Psychology |
Zdroj: | Néphrologie et Thérapeutique Néphrologie et Thérapeutique, Elsevier Masson, 2020, 16, pp.401-407. ⟨10.1016/j.nephro.2020.04.002⟩ Néphrologie & Thérapeutique Néphrologie & Thérapeutique, 2020, 16, pp.401-407. ⟨10.1016/j.nephro.2020.04.002⟩ |
ISSN: | 1769-7255 1872-9177 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nephro.2020.04.002⟩ |
Popis: | International audience; In France, the method of financing is mainly based on the quantity of care produced. The fixed-rate financing of patients with chronic kidney disease at stage IV or V introduces the notion of payment to quality. Part of the quality assessment will focus on the patients' feelings about their care. The objective of this paper is to assess these indicators used in nephrology, markers in their own right of the quality of care. The patients reported outcomes measures considering the impact of illness or care and the Patient Reported Experience Measures considering their perception of their experience with the health care system or care pathway, are broader than quality of life. These PROs are measured using standardized and validated questionnaires, generic or specific. The Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology initiative has shown that PROs, too often neglected in favor of biological criteria, are instead favored by patients. In the context of a broad deployment of monitoring the quality of life for the purpose of evaluation of care, outside research protocol, the Commission recommends one of the following 2 tools: EuroQol 5D and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, a compromise between feasibility and relevance and e-SATIS given its great use in health facilities, with an annual follow-up. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |