Modified BEST-J Score Model Predicts Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Fewer Factors

Autor: Tomoyuki Okada, Tsuyoshi Mikamo, Wataru Hamamoto, Taku Iwamoto, Toshiaki Okamoto, Kazunori Maeda, Atsushi Yanagitani, Kiwamu Tanaka, Hajime Isomoto, Naoyuki Yamaguchi
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Cancers; Volume 14; Issue 22; Pages: 5555
ISSN: 2072-6694
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225555
Popis: This study constructed a simplified post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) prediction model with a prognostic nutritional index (PNI). A total of 449 patients who underwent gastric ESD was included, divided with a ratio of 2:1, and assigned to the model or validation cohort. A prediction model of post-ESD (modified BEST-J score) was constructed using the model cohort. The modified BEST-J score was evaluated by comparing its accuracy to the BEST-J score in the validation cohort. Within 4 weeks of ESD, melena, hematemesis, or a 2 g/dL or greater decrease in hemoglobin level that required esophagogastroduodenoscopy was defined as post-ESD bleeding. In the model cohort, 299 patients were enrolled and 25 (8.4%) had post-ESD bleeding. Independent risk factors for post-ESD bleeding were use of P2Y12RA, tumor size > 30 mm, location of lesion at lower one-third of the stomach, and PNI ≤ 47.9. Constructing the modified BEST-J score based on these variables, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio were 73.9%, 78.1%, and 3.37. When comparing the modified BEST-J score to the BEST-J score in the validation cohort, no significant difference was observed by ROC-AUC (0.77 vs. 0.75, p = 0.81). Modified BEST-J score can predict post-ESD bleeding more simply, with the same accuracy as the BEST-J score.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje