Autor: |
Carlo Scarabelli, Angelo Gallo, Vincenzo Canzonieri, Antonio Zarrelli, Anna Carbone, M.C. Visentin |
Přispěvatelé: |
Scarabelli, C, Gallo, A, Visentin, Mc, Canzonieri, V, Carbone, A, Zarrelli, A |
Rok vydání: |
1997 |
Předmět: |
|
Popis: |
A comparative non-randomized study was carried out to evaluate the role of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (SL) on patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease (NRID) of advanced ovarian cancer (stage IIIC-IV). A total of 142 optimally cytoreduced patients (macroscopic disease absent on peritoneal surface) were divided into two groups: Group A, consisting of 98 patients (53 previously untreated and 45 pretreated at other Institutions), who underwent SL; Group B, consisting of 44 patients (21 previously untreated and 23 pretreated at other Institutions), who did not undergo SL. Each group had statistically equivalent histology, grading, performance status and variety of cytoreductive operations performed. Group A pretreated patients had a greater number of stage III than Group B (P = 0.03). Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy could be carried out with an acceptable morbidity and no mortality. All 142 patients received post-operative chemotherapy including carboplatin. The number of chemotherapy sessions did not differ between the two groups. Comparison of survival revealed that SL significantly improved the survival of previously untreated patients (P = 0.02). The survival was significantly different with nodal status (P = 0.006). Cox's proportional hazard analysis showed that only systematic lymphadenectomy was a significant covariate. The survival was not significantly different in Group A vs Group B pretreated patients; however, it was significantly different with respect to nodal status (P |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|