Research ethics committee approval as reported for abstracts submitted to the annual Euroanaesthesia meeting
| Autor: | Charles Marc Samama, Paul McConnell, Stefan De Hert, Nechama Kaufman, Zsolt Molnár, Sharon Einav |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Anesthesiology |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Research Report
medicine.medical_specialty Abstracting and Indexing education MEDLINE 0603 philosophy ethics and religion 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Informed consent Medicine Humans Anesthesia 030212 general & internal medicine Societies Medical Research ethics business.industry Ethics committee 06 humanities and the arts Congresses as Topic Europe Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Family medicine 060301 applied ethics business Medical ethics Ethics Committees Research |
| Zdroj: | European journal of anaesthesiology, 34(12), 824-830. Wolters Kluwer Health |
| ISSN: | 0265-0215 |
| Popis: | The annual congress of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) is one of the largest anaesthesia congresses in the world and exhibits more than 1200 abstracts annually. The aims of this study were to quantify the frequency of inadequate evidence of ethical approval for abstracts submitted to the ESA congress and to examine whether abstracts without appropriate ethical approval were subsequently accepted. All abstracts submitted in 2015 were adjudicated according to European ethical criteria. The proportion of submitted abstracts that lacked evidence of appropriate ethics committee approval. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of accepted abstract that lacked evidence of appropriate ethical approval; the proportion of correctly identified case reports; the proportion of accepted abstracts that lacked evidence of appropriate ethics committee approvals corresponding to location (within/outside Europe); and the proportion of accepted abstracts that lacked evidence of appropriate ethics committee approvals corresponding to a specific area of research. In total, 1792 abstracts were reviewed and 1572 (87.7%) involved humans. In 527 (29.4%), the authors failed to demonstrate adequate ethical approval with higher rates in abstracts submitted from Europe (32.1%) than the rest of the world (23.5%), P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|