Heparin-coated vs. Non-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits: Comparing Immediate Results with Different Target Activated Clotting Time

Autor: Ufuk Sayar, Ilker Mataraci, Muhammet Onur Hanedan, Ali Arslan, Aşkın Kiliç, Mehmet Ali Yürük
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 35, Iss 6, Pp 913-917 (2020)
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Issue: ahead, Published: 19 JUN 2020
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Volume: 35, Issue: 6, Pages: 913-917, Published: 19 JUN 2020
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.35 n.6 2020
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
ISSN: 1678-9741
Popis: Objective: To compare immediate postoperative results in patients receiving heparin-albumin-coated and non-coated circuits. Methods: A total of 241 patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were divided into two groups: those receiving heparin-coated circuits (Bioline®, Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany) and those receiving non-coated circuits (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany). Results: Activated clotting times (ACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were significantly shorter in the heparin-albumin-coated group than in the non-coated group (355.64±34.12 vs. 560.38±90.20, respectively, P=0.001). In-hospital mortality and postoperative stroke rates and lengths of intensive care unit stay were similar between the groups; in contrast, in the heparin-albumin-coated group, patients had significantly better outcomes for hospital stay, drainage, and need for erythrocyte transfusion. Conclusion: Heparin-coated circuits and reduced level of systemic heparinization with 300 seconds of target ACT level in cardiac surgery under CPB are safe and result in a very satisfactory clinical course.
Databáze: OpenAIRE