Evaluating Trends in COVID-19 Research Activity in Early 2020: The Creation and Utilization of a Novel Open-Access Database
| Autor: | Meghan Glibbery, John Y. S. Kim, Jillian Howden, Rebecca C Jones, Jasper C Ho, Mark Crowther, Maya Amar, Hannah Kearney, Sara Markovic, Daniel Levin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
trends
medicine.medical_specialty Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) media_common.quotation_subject coronavirus 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Pandemic medicine Quality (business) Narrative media_common research novel business.industry pandemic General Engineering covidreview sars-cov-2 Systematic review covid-19 Epidemiology/Public Health Family medicine business Inclusion (education) 030217 neurology & neurosurgery severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 |
| Zdroj: | Cureus |
| ISSN: | 2168-8184 |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.9943 |
| Popis: | Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been unprecedented in recent history. The rapid global spread has demonstrated how the emergence of a novel pathogen necessitates new information to advise both healthcare systems and policy-makers. The directives for the management of COVID-19 have been limited to infection control measures and treatment of patients, which has left physicians and researchers alone to navigate the massive amount of research being published while searching for evidence-based strategies to care for patients. To tackle this barrier, we launched CovidReview.ca, an open-access, continually updated, online platform that screens available COVID-19 research to determine higher quality publications. This paper uses data from this review process to explore the activity and trends of COVID-19 research worldwide over time, while specifically looking at the types of studies being published. Materials and Methods The literature search was conducted on PubMed. Search terms included “COVID-19”, “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2”, “coronavirus 19”, “SARS-COV-2”, and “2019-nCoV”. All articles captured by this strategy were reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers and categorized by type of research, relevant medical specialties, and type of publication. Criteria were developed to allow for inclusion or exclusion to the website. Due to the volume of research, only a level 1 (title and abstract) screen was performed. Results The time period for the analysis was January 17, 2020, to May 10, 2020. The total number of papers captured by the search criteria was 10,685, of which 2,742 were included on the website and 7,943 were excluded. The greatest increase in the types of studies over the 16 weeks was narrative review/expert opinion papers followed by case series/reports. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials remained the least published types of studies. Conclusions The surge of research that accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic is unparalleled in recent years. From our analysis, it is clear that case reports and narrative reviews were the most widely published, particularly in the earlier days of this pandemic. Continued research that falls higher on the evidence pyramid and is more applicable to clinical settings is warranted. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|