Surgical treatment of acute and chronic AC joint dislocations: Five-year experience with conventional and modified LARS fixation by a single surgeon
| Autor: | Benjamin L. Emmink, Philippe Wittich, R. Marijn Houwert, Jort Keizer, Detlef van der Velde, Yassine Ochen, Reinier B. Beks |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
030222 orthopedics
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Significant difference Retrospective cohort study 030229 sport sciences medicine.disease Article Single surgeon Surgery 03 medical and health sciences Fixation (surgical) 0302 clinical medicine medicine.anatomical_structure Ligament medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Major complication Joint dislocation Surgical treatment business |
| Zdroj: | J Orthop |
| ISSN: | 0972-978X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jor.2019.08.030 |
| Popis: | Background Different surgical fixation methods are available for the treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. The aim of this study was to present the results of five years of experience with the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) fixation technique by a single surgeon. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients treated for an AC joint dislocation with LARS fixation by the same surgeon between 2012 and 2016 (n = 20) were eligible for inclusion. All these dislocations were unstable injuries, Rockwood type-III or higher, requiring acute or chronic repair. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, return to work, complications, and implant removal. Results 17 patients (85%) were available for final follow-up. The median follow-up was 23 months (IQR; 17─34). The median QuickDASH score was 7 (IQR; 2–18), the median SSV was 90 (IQR; 80–90), and the median NRS pain score was 2 (IQR; 1–3). Patients returned to work after a median of 8 weeks (IQR; 6–12). There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores between acute and chronic repair, or between the conventional and modified LARS fixation groups. There were two major complications requiring revision surgery, one ruptured LARS ligament and one case of deep wound infection. Implant removal was performed in one patient. Conclusions The LARS ligament fixation technique seems to be effective for the treatment of AC joint dislocations, resulting in good short- and mid-term patient-reported functional outcome. LARS fixation might also be an acceptable treatment option for active patients with symptomatic chronic AC dislocations. Level of evidence Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study, Treatment Study. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect