| Popis: |
Little research has focused on the accuracy of gonad shield placement, especially by students. While studies have investigated the presence of gonad shields they do not aim to measure accuracy but only look at repeatability. This study aimed to establish students' knowledge of gonad shields and their accuracy in placing it.Following an invitation email and informed consent, students completed a 7-question questionnaire and placed a gonad shield on a Pixi full body adult phantom (male configuration). The phantom was x-rayed and images were assessed for gonad shield positioning in terms of obscuring bony anatomy, correct orientation and distance from a "gold standard" position.36% of images displayed shields covering bony anatomy while 16% of shields were incorrectly orientated. All shields incorrectly orientated also covered bony anatomy. Statistical significance was seen between incorrect shield orientation and the obscuring of bony anatomy (p = 0.01). Dispersion of positioning error measurements ranged from -6.80 mm (better placed than the "gold standard") to 62.35 mm inferiorly, with an average 28.22 mm inferiorly.The average misplacement of 28.22 mm suggests participants placed the gonad shielding lower than necessary to avoid obscuring bony anatomy. The 36% of misplaced shields, while lower than in previous studies, is still a significant number of radiographs that would require repeats.Given the associated difficulties surrounding gonad shields and their placement, this study supports previous research suggesting that the benefit of using gonad shielding is questionable. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect