Clinical Evaluation of Silorane and Nano-hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities up to 3 Years
| Autor: | Mutlu Özcan, Harika Gözde Gözükara-Bağ, Tuğba Toz, A Kara-Tuncer, Funda Öztürk-Bozkurt |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | University of Zurich |
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Materials science Surface Properties Resin composite 0206 medical engineering Color Dentistry 610 Medicine & health Restorations 02 engineering and technology Dental Caries Composite Resins 10068 Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry Dental Materials Young Adult Clinical 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine McNemar's test Nano hybrid Humans Silorane Resins Dental Restoration Permanent Nano-Hybrid Resin Composite (NHC) General Dentistry business.industry Significant difference 030206 dentistry Dental Marginal Adaptation 3500 General Dentistry 020601 biomedical engineering Female Filtek silorane business Clinical evaluation Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | Operative Dentistry. 41:599-606 |
| ISSN: | 1559-2863 0361-7734 |
| Popis: | SUMMARY In this study, the clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite (SC) vs a nano-hybrid resin composite (NHC) was evaluated in Class II cavities. From January 2012 to February 2013, a total of 29 patients (eight men, 21 women; mean age, 24 ± 5 years) received 29 pairs of restorations using both SC (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE) and NHC (Filtek Z550, 3M ESPE) materials. Patients were followed until February 2015. One operator performed all restorations using the corresponding adhesive resins according to the manufacturers' instructions. Two calibrated independent examiners evaluated the restorations at one week, six months, and then annually using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for anatomic form, marginal adaptation, color match, surface roughness, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity. Changes in the USPHS parameters were analyzed with the McNemar test (α=0.05). The mean observation period was 31.2 months. Marginal adaptation was the only parameter that showed a significant difference and was worse for SC than NHC (p=0.012). At the final recall, 17 restorations from the SC group and five from the NHC group received a score of 1 (explorer catches). These scores were significantly different between baseline and final recall for SC (p0.05). Both NHC and SC performed similarly in Class II restorations up to three years except for marginal adaptation, for which the latter demonstrated significant deterioration at the final recall compared with baseline. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|