1051. The Use of Survey-Driven Feedback to Improve Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts at a Single Center
Autor: | Fritzie S Albarillo, Cara Joyce, Maressa Santarossa |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry medicine.drug_class Cefepime Antibiotics Antimicrobial Abstracts Infectious Diseases Oncology Poster Abstracts Piperacillin/tazobactam Medicine Antimicrobial stewardship Vancomycin Prior authorization Formulary business Intensive care medicine medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Open Forum Infectious Diseases |
ISSN: | 2328-8957 |
Popis: | Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts have led to improved patient outcomes, reduction in unnecessary costs, and decrease in antimicrobial resistance (AR). Loyola University Medical Center (LUMC) is a quaternary care system that has primarily employed a formulary restriction and preauthorization process as the foundation of its Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP). Methods In January 2018, a voluntary online survey was created and disseminated to all providers at LUMC to evaluate their baseline knowledge and perception of AS and AR, as well as to solicit feedback on current AS practices at LUMC. Based on the results of the survey, our AS team implemented the following changes to the AS program: removed prior-authorization of cefepime, piperacillin–tazobactam and vancomycin; required documentation of antimicrobial indications and duration upon order entry in the electronic medical record; and provided education to all providers via newsletters and lectures. In January 2019, a second survey was distributed to all providers with the primary goal of evaluating changes in the providers’ knowledge and perception of AS and AR post-program modifications. The secondary goal was to gather feedback on the major changes we have implemented in our program. Results A total of 167 providers completed the first survey and 173 completed the second survey. Over 95% of providers were aware that inappropriate use of antimicrobials can be harmful to patients, and that AS can decrease AR. Unfamiliarity with AS practices remains an issue. More than half agreed that unrestricting antibiotics improved their workflow, though almost half agreed that it led to inappropriate use by providers in general but not their own. Finally, most providers agreed that documenting indications and duration of antibiotics facilitated antibiotic optimization with no interference in their workflow. Conclusion Hospital-specific surveys on providers’ perception and knowledge on AS and AR can be used to guide future ASP interventions, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Our ASP at LUMC implemented strategies to improve antimicrobial utilization based on our providers’ feedback. Our team will continue to use surveys to further guide our AS efforts. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |