A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach
| Autor: | Brett S. Torrence, Logan L. Watts, Michael D. Mumford, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Shane Connelly, E. Michelle Todd, Megan R. Turner |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Health (social science)
Knowledge management Process (engineering) 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Ethics Research Face-to-face Empirical research Management of Technology and Innovation 0502 economics and business Humans Learning Medicine Internet Medical education business.industry Teaching Health Policy 05 social sciences 06 humanities and the arts Hybrid approach Blended learning Issues ethics and legal aspects Face Ethics education 060301 applied ethics business 050203 business & management |
| Zdroj: | Science and Engineering Ethics. 23:1719-1754 |
| ISSN: | 1471-5546 1353-3452 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11948-017-9869-3 |
| Popis: | Despite the growing body of literature on training in the responsible conduct of research, few studies have examined the effectiveness of delivery formats used in ethics courses (i.e., face-to-face, online, hybrid). The present effort sought to address this gap in the literature through a meta-analytic review of 66 empirical studies, representing 106 ethics courses and 10,069 participants. The frequency and effectiveness of 67 instructional and process-based content areas were also assessed for each delivery format. Process-based contents were best delivered face-to-face, whereas contents delivered online were most effective when restricted to compliance-based instructional contents. Overall, hybrid courses were found to be most effective, suggesting that ethics courses are best delivered using a blend of formats and content areas. Implications and recommendations for future development of ethics education courses in the sciences are discussed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|