Validation and clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralisation test (sVNT)

Autor: Nicolas Vuilleumier, Marieke Hoogerwerf, Sabine Yerly, Giulia Torriani, Fion Brouwer, Isabella Eckerle, Benjamin Meyer, Chantal Reusken, Johan Reimerink, Gert Jan Godeke, Laurent Kaiser
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
0301 basic medicine
Male
Epidemiology
Betacoronavirus/genetics/immunology
ddc:616.07
Antibodies
Viral

Viral/blood
Neutralization
Drug Discovery
Medicine
Viral/blood/virology
neutralising antibodies
ddc:616
biology
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Vaccination
pseudovirus neutralisation assay
Titer
Infectious Diseases
surrogate virus neutralisation assay
Female
Antibody
Coronavirus Infections
Research Article
Adult
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
030106 microbiology
Pneumonia
Viral

Immunology
Context (language use)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Microbiology
Virus
Antibodies
Neutralizing/blood
cell-based virus neutralisation assay
03 medical and health sciences
Betacoronavirus
Immunity
Neutralization Tests
Virology
Coronavirus Infections/blood/virology
Humans
Pandemics
Aged
Neutralization Tests/methods
business.industry
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
Pneumonia
Antibodies
Neutralizing

030104 developmental biology
biology.protein
Parasitology
business
Zdroj: Emerging Microbes & Infections
article-version (VoR) Version of Record
Emerging Microbes & Infections, Vol. 9, No 1 (2020) pp. 2394-2403
ISSN: 2222-1751
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1835448
Popis: To understand SARS-CoV-2 immunity after natural infection or vaccination, functional assays such as virus neutralising assays are needed. So far, assays to detect SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies rely on cell-culture based infection assays either using wild type SARS-CoV-2 or pseudotyped viruses. Such assays are labour-intensive, require appropriate biosafety facilities and are difficult to standardize. Recently, a new surrogate virus neutralisation test (sVNT) was described that uses the principle of an ELISA to measure the neutralisation capacity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies directed against the receptor binding domain. Here, we performed an independent evaluation of the robustness, specificity and sensitivity on an extensive panel of sera from 269 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases and 259 unmatched samples collected before 2020 and compared it to cell-based neutralisation assays. We found a high specificity of 99.2 (95%CI: 96.9–99.9) and overall sensitivity of 80.3 (95%CI: 74.9–84.8) for the sVNT. Clinical sensitivity increased between early (14 dpos/dpd) from 75.0 (64.7–83.2) to 83.1 (76.5–88.1). Also, higher severity was associated with an increase in clinical sensitivity. Upon comparison with cell-based neutralisation assays we determined an analytical sensitivity of 74.3 (56.4–86.9) and 98.2 (89.4–99.9) for titres ≥10 to
Databáze: OpenAIRE