The Kalimantan Forest Fires: An Actor Analysis Based on Supreme Court Documents in Indonesia
| Autor: | Ajree Ducol Malawani, Eko Priyo Purnomo, Abitassha Az Zahra, Prathivadi B. Anand |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
local actors
economic activities 020209 energy media_common.quotation_subject lcsh:TJ807-830 Geography Planning and Development lcsh:Renewable energy sources 02 engineering and technology 010501 environmental sciences Management Monitoring Policy and Law Public administration CONTEST 01 natural sciences 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Clearing Farm workers lcsh:Environmental sciences 0105 earth and related environmental sciences media_common lcsh:GE1-350 Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment lcsh:Environmental effects of industries and plants Weak relationship Supreme court lcsh:TD194-195 Supreme Court Decisions Content analysis Cash Business forest fire |
| Zdroj: | Sustainability Volume 13 Issue 4 Sustainability, Vol 13, Iss 2342, p 2342 (2021) |
| ISSN: | 2071-1050 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/su13042342 |
| Popis: | Forest fires in Indonesia are of a local, national, and global concern, which is why the activities of local actors have emerged as a new problem in Indonesia, especially in Kalimantan. The current study employed a network content analysis method to examine the involvement of actors in forest fire cases based on Supreme Court decisions, complemented by several reputable online news sources such as kompas.com, detik.com, and tribun.com. By examining the cases, the actors involved were able to be identified as key actors, contest setters, and subject actors. Key actors, referring to companies and landowners, were found to have high correlations between one another. Moreover, key actors were observed to be involved in providing funds for land clearing or burning, yet they remained legally untouchable. Meanwhile, contest setters—permanent employees—were found to be the most involved in land burning/clearing, and they were often convicted in the Supreme Court rulings as they were merely commoners, farmers, and jobseekers in need of cash. Nevertheless, the subject actors, i.e., jobseekers and farm workers, were seen to have a weak relationship with key actors in the Supreme Court rulings, particularly in terms of forest burning and its operational funding. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|