Decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency cesarean section: a cross-sectional study
Autor: | Simachew Kassa Limenh, Tebabere Moltot Kitaw, Belete Negese Gemeda, Abayneh Shewangzaw Engda, Fantahun Alemnew Chekole, Simegnew Asmer Getie |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Emergency Cesarean Section Time Factors Referral Cross-sectional study Perinatal Death Clinical Decision-Making Reproductive medicine Data entry Bahir Dar lcsh:Gynecology and obstetrics Time-to-Treatment 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine Hospitals Urban Pregnancy Statistical significance medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Maternity service Emergency Treatment lcsh:RG1-991 Quality of Health Care 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine business.industry Cesarean Section Hospitals Public Infant Newborn Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic sampling Emergency cesarean section medicine.disease Obstetric Labor Complications Decision to delivery interval Perinatal Care Cross-Sectional Studies Practice Guidelines as Topic Maternal Death Female Medical emergency Ethiopia Guideline Adherence business Public hospitals Research Article |
Zdroj: | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
ISSN: | 1471-2393 |
Popis: | Background Emergency cesarean section is a commonly performed surgical procedure in pregnant women with life-threatening conditions of the mother and/or fetus. According to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, decision to delivery interval for emergency cesarean sections should be within 30 min. It is an indicator of quality of care in maternity service, and if prolonged, it constitutes a third-degree delay. This study aimed to assess the decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency cesarean section in Bahir Dar City Public Hospitals, Ethiopia. Method An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Bahir Dar City Public Hospitals from February to May 2020. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. A combination of observations and interviews was used to collect the data. Data entry and analysis were performed using Epi-data version 3.1 and SPSS version 25, respectively. Statistical significance was set at p Result Decision-to-delivery interval below 30 min was observed in 20.3% [95% CI = 15.90–24.70%] of emergency cesarean section. The results showed that referral status [AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.26–5.00], time of day of emergency cesarean section [AOR = 2.5, 95%CI = 1.26–4.92], status of surgeons [AOR = 2.95, 95%CI = 1.30–6.70], type of anesthesia [AOR = 4, 95% CI = 1.60–10.00] and transfer time [AOR = 5.26, 95% CI = 2.65–10.46] were factors significantly associated with the decision to delivery interval. Conclusion Decision-to-delivery intervals were not achieved within the recommended time interval. Therefore, to address institutional delays in emergency cesarean section, providers and facilities should be better prepared in advance and ready for rapid emergency action. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |