Rapid Naming and Phonemic Awareness in Children With Reading Disabilities and/or Specific Language Impairment
| Autor: | Bartholomeus J. A. De Groot, Kees P. van den Bos, Bieuwe van der Meulen, Alexander Minnaert |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Developmental and behavioural disorders in education and care: assessment and intervention |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Linguistics and Language
medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent media_common.quotation_subject Specific language impairment Audiology behavioral disciplines and activities Language and Linguistics Developmental psychology Dyslexia Speech and Hearing phomenic awareness Mental Processes Phonetics Reading (process) medicine Humans Names Child Rapid automatized naming media_common Analysis of Variance Language Disorders Language Tests Group membership Phonemic awareness NON-WORD REPETITION LITERACY Cognition DOUBLE-DEFICIT HYPOTHESIS Awareness medicine.disease rapid naming READING DISABILITIES Case-Control Studies ADOLESCENCE ORTHOGRAPHY DELAY SKILLS Female DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT Psychology DIFFICULTIES GERMAN Orthography |
| Zdroj: | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 58(5), 1538-1548. AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC |
| ISSN: | 1092-4388 |
| DOI: | 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0019 |
| Popis: | Purpose The objective of this study was to assess and compare the predictive values of group membership for rapid automatized naming (RAN) and phonemic awareness (PA) in Dutch school children with and without reading disabilities (RD) or specific language impairment (SLI). Method A composite word reading index and a formal SLI diagnosis were used to classify a total of 1,267 children aged 8 to 13 years old either as RD-only ( n = 126), SLI-only ( n = 21), comorbid (RD+SLI; n = 30), or typically developing ( n = 1,090). RAN and PA were assessed with 4 standardized subtests. The clinical subgroups were compared to each other and contrasted with the control group. Results For each subgroup, results indicate substantial effect sizes of RAN and PA. However, the RD-only group seems to be more affected by poor RAN than the SLI-only group, whereas the 2 groups perform equally poorly on PA. The comorbid group was revealed as most severely impaired on all measurements. Conclusions In studying RD and SLI, this research indicates that it is important to distinguish between RD-only, SLI-only, and comorbid groups. The comorbid group shows additive effects of both disorders. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14963622 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|