Octreoscan Versus FDG-PET for Neuroendocrine Tumor Staging: A Biological Approach
| Autor: | Kenneth Cardona, David A. Kooby, Joshua H. Winer, Deniz Altinel, Keith A. Delman, Malcolm H. Squires, Shishir K. Maithel, Juan M. Sarmiento, Maria C. Russell, Natalyn Hawk, Charles A. Staley, David M. Schuster, N. Volkan Adsay, Bassel F. El-Rayes |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Pathology specimens medicine.medical_specialty Tumor Staging Neuroendocrine tumors Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Surgical oncology Image Processing Computer-Assisted medicine Humans Prospective Studies Prospective cohort study Survival rate Aged Aged 80 and over medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Somatostatin receptor Indium Radioisotopes Middle Aged Prognosis medicine.disease Survival Rate Neuroendocrine Tumors Oncology Positron emission tomography Positron-Emission Tomography Female Surgery Radiology Neoplasm Grading Radiopharmaceuticals Somatostatin Tomography X-Ray Computed Nuclear medicine business Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | Annals of Surgical Oncology. 22:2295-2301 |
| ISSN: | 1534-4681 1068-9265 |
| DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-015-4471-x |
| Popis: | Clinicians may order Octreoscan or positron emission tomography (PET) scan for staging patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). (111)In-Octreoscan (Octreoscan) identifies tumors by radiolabeled targeting of somatostatin receptors, while 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) measures differential tissue glucose transport. We assessed the sensitivity of both nuclear imaging modalities with pathologic correlation to define the best initial choice for NET staging after standard cross-sectional imaging.We identified all patients diagnosed with NETs of gastrointestinal or pancreatic origin who underwent nuclear imaging staging by Octreoscan and/or PET from 2000 to 2013. Imaging results were correlated with tumor differentiation and grade of pathology specimens.Imaging and pathology results were identified for 153 patients. Of these, 131 underwent Octreoscan, 43 underwent PET, and 21 patients had both performed. Overall sensitivity of Octreoscan and PET for NET detection was similar (77 vs. 72 %; p = not significant). For well-differentiated NETs, Octreoscan (n = 124) demonstrated sensitivity of 80 vs. 60 % (p = 0.28) for PET (n = 30). For poorly-differentiated NETs, Octreoscan (n = 7) proved significantly less sensitive than PET (n = 13) (57 vs. 100 %; p = 0.02). The sensitivity of Octreoscan versus PET varied similarly when analyzed by WHO tumor grade: Grade 1 (79 vs. 52 %; p = 0.16), Grade 2 (85 vs. 86 %; p = not significant), and Grade 3 (57 vs. 100 %; p = 0.02).Tumor differentiation can be used to guide selection of nuclear imaging modalities for staging gastrointestinal and pancreatic NETs. Octreoscan appears more sensitive than (18)FDG-PET for well-differentiated NETs, whereas (18)FDG-PET demonstrates superior sensitivity for poorly-differentiated NETs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink