Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature
| Autor: | Michael Siegrist, Lynn J. Frewer, Mary Brennan, Wim Verbeke, Arnout R.H. Fischer, C M J L Vereijken, Gene Rowe, René Lion, Ree M. Meertens, D Bánáti |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Health promotion, RS: CAPHRI - R6 - Promoting Health & Personalised Care, RS: NUTRIM - R1 - Metabolic Syndrome |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Agriculture and Food Sciences
CONSUMER Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Risk perception Databases Factual PLANNED BEHAVIOR Process (engineering) Cost-Benefit Analysis media_common.quotation_subject Best practice Persuasive Communication Applied psychology WASS Risk Assessment DISEASE Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0404 agricultural biotechnology risk communication Risk Factors Perception BENEFITS Humans ATTITUDES METAANALYSIS media_common benefit communication PERCEPTION Variables business.industry Environmental resource management Theory of planned behavior trust 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences General Medicine Food safety 040401 food science food safety Communication Intervention SAFETY food hazard FISH CONSUMPTION Marktkunde en Consumentengedrag RISK INFORMATION-SEEKING business Psychology Risk communication Benefit communication Food hazard Trust Food Science |
| Zdroj: | Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(10), 1728-1745 CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56 (2016) 10 Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56 (10) Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(10), 1728-1745. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group |
| ISSN: | 1040-8398 1549-7852 |
| Popis: | A systematic review relevant to the following research questions was conducted (1) the extent to which different theoretical frameworks have been applied to food risk/benefit communication and (2) the impact such food risk/benefit communication interventions have had on related risk/benefit attitudes and behaviors. Fifty four papers were identified. The analysis revealed that (primarily European or US) research interest has been relatively recent. Certain food issues were of greater interest to researchers than others, perhaps reflecting the occurrence of a crisis, or policy concern. Three broad themes relevant to the development of best practice in risk (benefit) communication were identified: the characteristics of the target population; the contents of the information; and the characteristics of the information sources. Within these themes, independent and dependent variables differed considerably. Overall, acute risk (benefit) communication will require advances in communication process whereas chronic communication needs to identify audience requirements. Both citizen's risk/benefit perceptions and (if relevant) related behaviors need to be taken into account, and recommendations for behavioral change need to be concrete and actionable. The application of theoretical frameworks to the study of risk (benefit) communication was infrequent, and developing predictive models of effective risk (benefit) communication may be contingent on improved theoretical perspectives. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56 (10) ISSN:1040-8398 ISSN:1549-7852 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|