Current guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis

Autor: Simona Leoni, Francesco Tovoli, Lucia Napoli, S. Ferri, Ilaria Serio, Luigi Bolondi
Přispěvatelé: Leoni, Simona, Tovoli, Francesco, Napoli, Lucia, Serio, Ilaria, Ferri, Silvia, Bolondi, Luigi
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
0301 basic medicine
Fibrosi
Biopsy
Bariatric Surgery
Disease
Global Health
Chronic liver disease
0302 clinical medicine
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Prevalence
Ultrasonography
Evidence-Based Medicine
Non-invasive diagnosi
Liver Function Test
Fatty liver
Gastroenterology
General Medicine
Liver biopsy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Metformin
Liver
Liver steatosi
Practice Guidelines as Topic
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Human
medicine.medical_specialty
Alcohol Drinking
digestive system
03 medical and health sciences
Internal medicine
medicine
Obesity
Intensive care medicine
Clinical guideline
Protective Agent
Pioglitazone
Hypoglycemic Agent
business.industry
Risk Factor
Significant difference
Metabolic risk
nutritional and metabolic diseases
Non alcoholic
Hepatology
medicine.disease
digestive system diseases
Liver Transplantation
030104 developmental biology
Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2

business
Dyslipidemia
Zdroj: World Journal of Gastroenterology. 24:3361-3373
ISSN: 1007-9327
Popis: The current epidemic of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is reshaping the field of hepatology all around the world. The widespread diffusion of metabolic risk factors such as obesity, type2-diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia has led to a worldwide diffusion of NAFLD. In parallel to the increased availability of effective anti-viral agents, NAFLD is rapidly becoming the most common cause of chronic liver disease in Western Countries, and a similar trend is expected in Eastern Countries in the next years. This epidemic and its consequences have prompted experts from all over the word in identifying effective strategies for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of NAFLD. Different scientific societies from Europe, America, and Asia-Pacific regions have proposed guidelines based on the most recent evidence about NAFLD. These guidelines are consistent with the key elements in the management of NAFLD, but still, show significant difference about some critical points. We reviewed the current literature in English language to identify the most recent scientific guidelines about NAFLD with the aim to find and critically analyse the main differences. We distinguished guidelines from 5 different scientific societies whose reputation is worldwide recognised and who are representative of the clinical practice in different geographical regions. Differences were noted in: the definition of NAFLD, the opportunity of NAFLD screening in high-risk patients, the non-invasive test proposed for the diagnosis of NAFLD and the identification of NAFLD patients with advanced fibrosis, in the follow-up protocols and, finally, in the treatment strategy (especially in the proposed pharmacological management). These difference have been discussed in the light of the possible evolution of the scenario of NAFLD in the next years.
Databáze: OpenAIRE