State Budget Independent, Market-Based Instruments to Finance Renewable Heat Strategies
| Autor: | Jan Steinbach, Ulf Jacobshagen, Michael Nast, Mario Ragwitz, Edmund Brandt, Markus Kachel, Friedrich Seefeldt, Veit Bürger |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Publica |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Policy instruments
Market based Finance policy instrument Environmental Engineering Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment business.industry media_common.quotation_subject Renewable heat Energy Engineering and Power Technology Subsidy renewable heating financing renewable energy sources Renewable energy State (polity) Software deployment Economics Portfolio Electricity business Energy (miscellaneous) media_common |
| Zdroj: | Energy & Environment. 24:195-218 |
| ISSN: | 2048-4070 0958-305X |
| DOI: | 10.1260/0958-305x.24.1-2.195 |
| Popis: | At present, expanding the use of renewable energy sources for heating (RES-H) relies predominantly on publicly funded support instruments. As these are subject to subsidy cuts and suspensions, these instruments do not provide long-term security for investors and technology suppliers. Although feed-in tariffs and quota-based systems are the major support schemes for renewable energy sources in the electricity sector, similar policy designs have not been applied to RES-H. This paper presents and evaluates three different policy instruments which have the potential to finance RES-H without using public funds: A physical quota system for biomass, a technology-based quota system ( Portfolio Model) and a remuneration-based system ( Premium model). The assessment suggests that while the Portfolio Model and the Premium Model are both promising policies to enhance RES-H deployment, there is greater acceptance among stakeholders for the Premium Model. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|