Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
| Autor: | Neenah Estrella-Luna, Michael K. Paasche-Orlow, Lika Nusbaum, Karla Damus, Brenda Douglas |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
interviews
Process (engineering) 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Article clinical 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Informed consent semistructured 030212 general & internal medicine Risks and benefits General Nursing lcsh:RT1-120 Medical education risks and benefits research lcsh:Nursing Perspective (graphical) informed consent 06 humanities and the arts Clinical trial Comprehension Clinical research 060301 applied ethics Psychology Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | Global Qualitative Nursing Research Global Qualitative Nursing Research, Vol 4 (2017) |
| ISSN: | 2333-3936 |
| Popis: | Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and attitudes of informed consent experts about conveying risks and benefits to inform the development of a survey about the perspectives of research nurses who are responsible for obtaining informed consent for clinical trials. The major themes identified were strategies for risks and benefits communication, ensuring comprehension, and preparation for the role of the consent administrator. From the experts’ perspective, inadequate education and training of the research staff responsible for informed consent process contribute to deficiencies in the informed consent process and risks and benefits communication. Inconsistencies in experts’ opinions and critique of certain widely used communication practices require further consideration and additional research. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|